From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34513: display-line-numbers in term mode Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 19:33:36 +0200 Message-ID: <831s3tkufj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190217141940.62v754v46qwfcs2i@Ergus> <83h8cpkyi8.fsf@gnu.org> <8336o9kvph.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="36073"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34513@debbugs.gnu.org, spacibba@aol.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 18:35:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gz370-0009HM-6q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:35:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz36z-0003ls-1a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:35:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54646) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz35x-00036f-6N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz35u-0004Yy-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:34:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz35m-0004Wb-Nu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:34:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz35m-0005tJ-Gg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34513 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34513-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34513.155128881922616 (code B ref 34513); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34513) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2019 17:33:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54292 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz35O-0005si-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:33:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40086) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz35L-0005sU-U1 for 34513@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:33:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz35A-0004GA-H8; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:33:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2175 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gz356-0006kN-Og; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:33:23 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:21:26 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155861 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: spacibba@aol.com, 34513@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:21:26 -0500 > > >> How 'bout display-line-numbers-width or display-line-numbers-current-width? > > I think I considered those at the time, but found them not descriptive > > enough. > > And how 'bout now? Same. My problem was, and is, that the name should include "display-width", since that's what the function provides. And the problem, of course, is that "display-line-numbers-" already includes "display" and "line-number", so repeating any of that produces problematic names. > At first, TAB completion gave me the impression that there was simply no > way to know from Elisp the actual width, because the list of completions > seemed long enough to have the appearance of exhaustiveness. Maybe just mentioning the variable in the doc string of display-line-numbers-mode would be "good enough".