From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:45:43 +0300 Message-ID: <831rpc7aag.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d0945r4z.fsf@gmail.com> <83bloocnzo.fsf@gnu.org> <87eetco917.fsf@gmail.com> <838sjk7dj8.fsf@gnu.org> <87a740o7tc.fsf@gmail.com> <834ku87c6v.fsf@gnu.org> <871rpco5rz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="51564"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 28 16:46:31 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIDfK-000DHE-1n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:46:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIDfJ-0002JN-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:46:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIDeV-00014T-Lw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:45:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIDeV-0003AI-Ik; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:45:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1265 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jIDeU-0006B8-MM; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:45:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871rpco5rz.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtw?= =?utf-8?B?w6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= on Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:31:12 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245885 Archived-At: > From: Štěpán Němec > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:31:12 +0100 > > But yes, it would at least be less confusing than the current wording, > so if you don't want to remove the note, it would be an improvement I > think. Thanks, let's see what others think about this.