* bug#39780: [PATCH] Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the documentation
@ 2020-02-25 12:58 Štěpán Němec
2020-04-18 11:51 ` Štěpán Němec
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Štěpán Němec @ 2020-02-25 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: 39780
I was at a loss as to why my attempt to set up spam-stat seemed to
have no effect, only to find (digging in the code) that it was
ignoring most of the sample files due to this undocumented variable.
* doc/misc/gnus.texi (Creating a spam-stat dictionary): Document
the variable 'spam-stat-process-directory-age'.
---
doc/misc/gnus.texi | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/misc/gnus.texi b/doc/misc/gnus.texi
index 424e15bc6d..718e269fc8 100644
--- a/doc/misc/gnus.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/gnus.texi
@@ -25668,6 +25668,13 @@ Creating a spam-stat dictionary
file is treated as one non-spam mail.
@end defun
+@defvar spam-stat-process-directory-age
+Maximum age of files to be processed, in days. Without this filter,
+re-training spam-stat with several thousand messages could take a long
+time. The default is 90, but you might want to set this to a bigger
+value during the initial training.
+@end defvar
+
Usually you would call @code{spam-stat-process-spam-directory} on a
directory such as @file{~/Mail/mail/spam} (this usually corresponds to
the group @samp{nnml:mail.spam}), and you would call
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#39780: [PATCH] Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the documentation
2020-02-25 12:58 bug#39780: [PATCH] Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the documentation Štěpán Němec
@ 2020-04-18 11:51 ` Štěpán Němec
2020-04-18 12:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Štěpán Němec @ 2020-04-18 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: 39780
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:58:12 +0100
Štěpán Němec wrote:
> I was at a loss as to why my attempt to set up spam-stat seemed to
> have no effect, only to find (digging in the code) that it was
> ignoring most of the sample files due to this undocumented variable.
>
> * doc/misc/gnus.texi (Creating a spam-stat dictionary): Document
> the variable 'spam-stat-process-directory-age'.
> ---
> doc/misc/gnus.texi | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/misc/gnus.texi b/doc/misc/gnus.texi
> index 424e15bc6d..718e269fc8 100644
> --- a/doc/misc/gnus.texi
> +++ b/doc/misc/gnus.texi
> @@ -25668,6 +25668,13 @@ Creating a spam-stat dictionary
> file is treated as one non-spam mail.
> @end defun
>
> +@defvar spam-stat-process-directory-age
> +Maximum age of files to be processed, in days. Without this filter,
> +re-training spam-stat with several thousand messages could take a long
> +time. The default is 90, but you might want to set this to a bigger
> +value during the initial training.
> +@end defvar
> +
> Usually you would call @code{spam-stat-process-spam-directory} on a
> directory such as @file{~/Mail/mail/spam} (this usually corresponds to
> the group @samp{nnml:mail.spam}), and you would call
Any reason not to include this in emacs-27?
--
Štěpán
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#39780: [PATCH] Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the documentation
2020-04-18 11:51 ` Štěpán Němec
@ 2020-04-18 12:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-04-18 15:19 ` Štěpán Němec
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2020-04-18 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Štěpán Němec; +Cc: 39780
> From: Štěpán Němec
> <stepnem@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:51:55 +0200
>
> Any reason not to include this in emacs-27?
Documentation changes are always OK on the release branch, if they
pertain to features that exist on the branch.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#39780: [PATCH] Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the documentation
2020-04-18 12:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2020-04-18 15:19 ` Štěpán Němec
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Štěpán Němec @ 2020-04-18 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 39780-done
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:29:46 +0300
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Any reason not to include this in emacs-27?
>
> Documentation changes are always OK on the release branch, if they
> pertain to features that exist on the branch.
Thank you; pushed to emacs-27:
2019-07-31T09:51:09+02:00!stepnem@gmail.com
52288f4b66 (Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the documentation)
https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=52288f4b66
--
Štěpán
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-18 15:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-25 12:58 bug#39780: [PATCH] Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the documentation Štěpán Němec
2020-04-18 11:51 ` Štěpán Němec
2020-04-18 12:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-04-18 15:19 ` Štěpán Němec
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.