From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43128: Acknowledgement (27.1; DPI change not detected after switching to Emacs 27.1) Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:16:25 +0300 Message-ID: <831rjkw9fq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k0xf9sqv.fsf@luffy.cx> <878sdsljrt.fsf@luffy.cx> <87ft80twsd.fsf@luffy.cx> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16992"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43128@debbugs.gnu.org To: Vincent Bernat Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 02 16:17:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kDTZV-0004He-LI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 16:17:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52776 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDTZU-0005cj-Nd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDTZO-0005cP-Kv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDTZO-0000GR-B0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDTZO-0007ux-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43128 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43128-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43128.159905621330417 (code B ref 43128); Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43128) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2020 14:16:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60242 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDTZF-0007uX-9c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:16:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDTZB-0007uI-QA for 43128@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDTZ4-0000A5-5c; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3949 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kDTZ1-0000qu-V6; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:16:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ft80twsd.fsf@luffy.cx> (message from Vincent Bernat on Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:20:18 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186932 Archived-At: > From: Vincent Bernat > Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:20:18 +0200 > Cc: 43128@debbugs.gnu.org > > It may be a bit late now that 27.1 is released, but #36284 has an easy > workaround of moving the default face outside init Can you elaborate on that workaround? I don't think I understand what you mean by "moving the default face outside init". Did you mean some code change? if so, could you tell more about the change you had in mind?