From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 19:41:48 +0300 Message-ID: <831rjgp44z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> <83d030pfrf.fsf@gnu.org> <5bd82b3a-0108-5dd4-88dd-e3def6b77e01@cornell.edu> <835z8sp5pi.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40214"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Ken Brown Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 05 18:43:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbHQ-000AMf-R8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 18:43:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53842 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbHP-0001DJ-O3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbHK-0001DA-8D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbHJ-0003uz-VE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:43:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbHJ-0006Ky-Sr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:43:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 16:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25542 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 25542-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25542.159932413124303 (code B ref 25542); Sat, 05 Sep 2020 16:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 16:42:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbGU-0006Jv-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:42:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbGN-0006JM-JQ for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbGH-0003rE-GO; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2554 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbGG-0002ce-VA; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:41:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Ken Brown on Sat, 5 Sep 2020 12:10:59 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187280 Archived-At: > Cc: dmoncayo@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, > npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, rudalics@gmx.at > From: Ken Brown > Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 12:10:59 -0400 > > > Thanks for testing. It sounds like the proposed change leaves the > > original incorrect behavior unchanged, so we need to look for some > > different way of fixing this. > > It's not unchanged, it's just wrong in a different way. Previously the second > F11 resulted in an unmaximized frame. You are right, sorry for my confusion.