From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47024: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Warnings from async compilations truncated Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:51:51 +0200 Message-ID: <831rcnp154.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sg54p6cl.fsf@gnu.org> <83im5zpu6p.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6rbp36e.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5414"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47024@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 10 14:52:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJzGB-0001Hq-2q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:52:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54688 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJzGA-0000y8-52 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:52:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJzFq-0000y1-IG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJzFq-0003lc-An for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJzFq-0005Wj-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47024 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47024-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47024.161538432121238 (code B ref 47024); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47024) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2021 13:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49247 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJzFp-0005WT-5F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36608) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJzFn-0005WE-A1 for 47024@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:51:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33460) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJzFi-0003gT-1i; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:51:54 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4124 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lJzFh-0006pH-Fs; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:51:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:12:59 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201983 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: 47024@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:12:59 +0000 > > > seq.el:396:16: Warning: `seq-contains' is an obsolete generic function (as of > > 27.1); use `seq-contains-p' instead. > > > > There's an actual newline at the end of the first line, because by > > default we _fill_ the text. > > > > So I think the solution should be to bind (in the sub-process which > > performs the actual compilation) warning-fill-column to a large > > number. > > Nice, is 256 a reasonable number? How about most-positive-fixnum? > > Is there a similar issue with error messages? > > Yes, we suffer from the same issue if the Error is emitted with new > lines. But is there a similar variable to bind in that case? fill-column, perhaps?