From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45 Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 22:51:14 +0300 Message-ID: <831r506025.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sfxhm5aw.fsf@gnus.org> <9bffb61b-c948-c431-4fb0-bbc74e91dfe2@gmail.com> <837des6479.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18608"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, raman@google.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 21:52:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXU0T-0004a3-5I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:52:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43456 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXU0R-0000Ve-Kc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:52:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXTzj-0008GB-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35022) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXTzh-0002UI-Tb; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:51:25 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3822 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXTzh-0007fY-GO; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:51:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:18:30 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276261 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: "T.V Raman" , cpitclaudel@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:18:30 -0400 > > > Why do you assume that starting from .elc will have fewer problems > > than starting from .el? > > Converting a `.elc` file to a `.eln` file can be done by a pure function > with no need for any extra information. I very much doubt that. > In contrast, converting a `.el` to a `.elc` or `.eln` requires extra > information (typically extra files that define macros and functions used > during macro expansion, plus `load-path` settings to find those files, or > commands to load those files, sometimes in a particular order). I have no reason to believe that the problems we see with native compilation are related to these aspects. Do you have evidence of that?