From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57129: 29.0.50; Improve behavior of conditionals in Eshell Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:18:08 +0300 Message-ID: <831qt79pjj.fsf__3475.20888769708$1661253559$gmane$org@gnu.org> References: <2758072.AiC22s8V5E@nimes> <2dc7ede0-eca7-baf5-f89a-f5d292b80808@cs.ucla.edu> <3893771.2iPT33SAM4@nimes> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1745"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, bug-gnulib@gnu.org, 57129@debbugs.gnu.org To: Bruno Haible Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 23 13:19:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oQRw8-0000I7-WB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 13:19:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQRw8-0000xL-3z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:19:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQRvz-0000vS-P3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQRvy-0007Wk-Id for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oQRvy-0005jv-Ab for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 11:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57129 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57129-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57129.166125349722003 (code B ref 57129); Tue, 23 Aug 2022 11:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57129) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2022 11:18:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oQRvE-0005io-MV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:18:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oQRv9-0005iX-OO for 57129@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:18:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQRv2-0007P8-JC; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:18:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=sdsUdVX/4QPwb/YNxIdHPBRg0m5iUfgZ1pKpHiy4IhU=; b=SA6l0lbifShLfvnNdYEi EOMURV+KNmVdEa/VWo+Kkri+OLb3AbrsXmmozFKMpgmGzcT7K+2rhw/hcmArRf6JF1sQ1ZxOyFul7 HnvXQ4xcbuVFd5w4JpZwXRXz8COSaxDcDQP/0FMyoB17t0js7DNp68Tj5CCqhKETR0hz/utM4wizq ginBjpJm7eofYIP+pXFc03LuREtUFFcRp14z2lh+ZPlehn+IcKWcmbSRF4Plklvak3S0z4KO8eFtq 4C70a/lWsejhbM1ShdqkUZceM8SOhIBFm1B1UyuGghAB85sHmv0rhqCEbPF8I7psCYD3mRGtVYiog bx7ZlonRFjDoLw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3185 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQRv1-0007NK-6q; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:18:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3893771.2iPT33SAM4@nimes> (message from Bruno Haible on Tue, 23 Aug 2022 02:13:02 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240526 Archived-At: > From: Bruno Haible > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , bug-gnulib@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, 57129@debbugs.gnu.org, jporterbugs@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 02:13:02 +0200 > > > If I understand things > > correctly, these patches should fix the 0.1% failure rate you observed > > on 64-bit mingw. > > Yes. Running the "case 2" part 1000 times again, among the 2000 generated > file names, there are no duplicates — neither on 32-bit mingw, nor on 64-bit > mingw. Was that with or without using clock_gettime? If it was with clock_gettime, what happens without it (i.e. when 'clock' is used instead)? Thanks.