From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: xref-query-replace-in-results error message after xref-find-definitions, was: Re: bug#58158: 29.0.50; [overlay] Interval tree iteration considered harmful Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 08:17:10 +0300 Message-ID: <831qrdei3t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83edvuhaby.fsf@gnu.org> <831qruh67o.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1u2foli.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgehe6iq.fsf@gnu.org> <95113379-99d8-eba4-f980-a7fca11430d5@yandex.ru> <834jwfmn5a.fsf@gnu.org> <838rlohzeo.fsf@gnu.org> <83mta2g91p.fsf@gnu.org> <237a3e26-03b8-a2a9-90bd-d50c3670a131@yandex.ru> <83wn96efyn.fsf@gnu.org> <5bb803bf-f51b-c175-f908-c60066d6967d@yandex.ru> <83v8oqeeqf.fsf@gnu.org> <7c0849be-145e-e073-49b5-63749e8d8282@yandex.ru> <83sfjuecyw.fsf@gnu.org> <83k056e4dz.fsf@gnu.org> <83h70ae23f.fsf@gnu.org> <21c2aec6-ee5e-c794-de3c-808356e72eb9@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35310"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 12 07:19:53 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oiU9o-00090s-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:19:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34752 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiU9n-0005j1-4Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 01:19:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiU73-0004EG-G2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 01:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiU73-0000rZ-5v; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 01:17:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=UcA8O9TBUVpX9vzxCaQf0XWsvLskRVfSPMZwkoiMPQA=; b=oJOxejHvPYbR vQOGOczv/Vi4LtfAzfYGgAlPOj5Xtr5aNgI2YRPlurnC4qbN/6wYUnJgsqd6zGqBqeXLq0fe9mx0J zpjIFlTrpNI7rlKZ539hHA+bPGm6xrIsitKa70hHYuCs8aMEjkH8GmXUU4CUonGLYxOwa7qEHH9fb LnWcugXZ1+u9OCyeN65sgHcFFsXMyKMk51GtRKfxs1nZo8S4wDdHmTUsuMHoTmJYgUoqGoQwa60W+ rDMH1IxMDVEJIyC4OCTBKR7mrmvAPCFoRE9COHSUvv4hsL+/08XymYg9TUWUyN8Ba3S3YqWuWRO6b n0fRRzEl+cNc49xUNWExcA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1814 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiU72-0003l6-EK; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 01:17:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <21c2aec6-ee5e-c794-de3c-808356e72eb9@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 11 Oct 2022 23:31:01 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297568 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 23:31:01 +0300 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 11.10.2022 19:50, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > So is this: > > > > Cannot perform global replacement in find-definition results > > > > the best that can be done? It sounds like no alternative is > > significantly better. > > Perhaps. > > Let's drop the "global" adjective, though: whether the command works > "globally", "locally", or etc, depends on how the user made the search. The "global" part is important, though: it's supposed to hint on why find-definition results cannot be used. The opposite of "global" here is "partial", not "local". If you can suggest a better word for "global" here, please do. > Then we can make this the error message and wait and see until the next > time anybody complains about the new phrasing. Probably after Emacs 29. Yep.