From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/eglot-texi-manual 4725c123f3 2/5: ; eglot.texi: Fix typos and minor inconsistenciesfeature/eglot-texi-manual 4725c123f3 2/5: ; eglot.texi: Fix typos and minor inconsistencies Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:20:51 +0300 Message-ID: <831qr2xy8s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h6zyye3f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27284"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Rudolf =?utf-8?Q?Adamkovi=C4=8D?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 20 19:06:57 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1olZ0S-0006qM-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:06:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55710 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olZ0J-0006w3-0x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:06:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [::1] (helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olYq1-00070s-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olYHy-0007pw-Rw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:20:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olYHy-0004eD-JK; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:20:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=rXHWavsylGpF2lMDaXIxIp8XbB1CvmAaFQGK5YnKN4k=; b=N+oZA9h3LzCkvT5ciJdp J7+5UpNFC/7Th9FhjHXbt0s/lsihDiuvJ62/o5NC6eR/kRqFz+KJvw+tGmnxpEcOFYBdairT1nbRH iWjjdUgt7IER/Hkj3gK6EBZDv1pLqWNS5GHpsCozZBUtWtALz4s2Efz90qzHiFYU0IOSdmkw9iJmz g2D0KrYLoSPOBDnc6EdJV9cjgcdO2s+GChRTlgqAIGlMDwQvP7YRzqlmYYw995Qqtf/Kbdq1L+2ou DsOy+T+oZfEqr6r3yIFAPLFfEIMlzjuPvK4dIiFQKq7u8OwXe0QynBA3PrNgyQEdilH3djp6mHbWi 4dJsYxdVNFMc2Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2066 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olYHu-00006J-DF; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:20:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Rudolf =?utf-8?Q?Adamko?= =?utf-8?Q?vi=C4=8D?= on Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:11:57 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298159 Archived-At: > From: Rudolf Adamkovič > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:11:57 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > They [the changes] seem to be personal stylistic preferences, in which > > case please revert them: there's nothing wrong with alternative > > stylistic preferences. > > Yes, there is nothing "wrong" with the text, but style matters greatly > in writing, and the new version reads better. Not to me. And we shouldn't argue about this, because that's what personal stylistic preferences are about: they are personal. > Thus, as a reader, and also a non-native speaker, I prefer the > patched version. As a person who wrote the original text, I prefer that version. > For instance, "of what does Eglot management of a buffer entail" makes > me re-parse the sentence, whereas "of what Eglot management of a buffer > entails" reads naturally. I didn't revert that part.