From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 19:02:06 +0300 Message-ID: <831qkf97y9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <875y9yfxrr.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1muefks.fsf@gmail.com> <834jpifizy.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1mue1qi.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd2e01f.fsf@gnu.org> <1a5e5837-513b-84d8-3260-cdbf42b71267@gutov.dev> <83sfcz9rf2.fsf@gnu.org> <09a49ab9-ac72-36a9-3e68-9c633710eba7@gutov.dev> <06d29dbd-0b33-8698-bcb8-c89368612f54@gutov.dev> <252e77fb-9657-a5be-2e86-234f7b05d162@gutov.dev> <83edog84cm.fsf@gnu.org> <834jpc805p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24815"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, dmitry@gutov.dev, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 19 18:03:41 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ppAHT-00065t-I6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:03:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppAGx-0005qs-0D; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppAGt-0005fz-Re for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppAGs-000716-MX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppAGs-0000PT-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.16819201271502 (code B ref 62720); Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2023 16:02:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppAFz-0000OA-8m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppAFv-0000Nc-OE for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:02:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppAFo-0006la-Pu; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:01:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=iSz0d+PTTp9AEshTRckS1HZ1xzvYOwQAAyWpgSB4SQo=; b=QPi5yZ0XOKgJ5vFn1WGq kCPoOotXpZglx6DBaBEt9DS6Y4CQSekw8xpPyQC8skTlwMnkYkFi68xv9LzNKKkQ7FkKr7ctZabXU mR5zGcvWAJqdNPzUaJ/tFqZ3SzBZgAC2jZahi2Pb8A0ER3uMmOwtFrLyffmNJndq74Bd2kqmsooYh gy4IbvEZWhOostHM4mHWqi0URZzWSdjdoisv3uM9J3lcdG1D0hEti6sm2FfKOlRNTvhlDEOdtSMAc qlrPBlHFOmEw0Da7rRB31ndlW/S1c4B6QfaGmVkQTQ+W9YpcuOn8KONrCRsCkfU3BKYUF3GU2wvX9 X+1iDhZgKTxdLA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppAFn-0006PS-Uk; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:01:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= on Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:04:30 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:260277 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:04:30 +0100 > Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, rpluim@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, > 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:35 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > My interpretation of option 2 is that we get a newer Eglot (1.14 or > > 1.15, whichever you decide is stable enough) with various minor > > fallbacks intended to work around the fact that dependency packages > > are not necessarily at their versions for which Eglot 1.14/1.15 was > > designed to work, if the versions of those dependencies in Emacs 29.1 > > are older. > > Why put ourselves (mostly myself) through these chores?? Because I thought we agreed that requiring newer versions of other packages where that could be avoided (note: "could be avoided", not "is nice to have") is a Good Thing, and is well worth these chores. But if you don't agree, fine; just one more disagreement between us. > Just so that two weeks later after whatever Emacs 29 is officially > released a more recent, "stable" version is already available? No, just so users of Emacs 29 could have a better Eglot without any complications. But again, have it your way. I said I won't argue with your decision in this matter. I just wanted you and everyone else to understand my position on this.