From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68006: 30.0.50; Image-mode speed Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:25:13 +0200 Message-ID: <831qawvx7q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87le9jlfd6.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <8334voanr1.fsf@gnu.org> <877cl0zvln.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83y1dg954u.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfxvalnq.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83o7eb938y.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmsxmff3.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83mstt5hrk.fsf@gnu.org> <87frzjvpb5.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83le9a3kqs.fsf@gnu.org> <83zfxnzyrb.fsf@gnu.org> <87mstnafie.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83r0izzn1p.fsf@gnu.org> <87le95rqoh.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83plyhvvso.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6jtrlci.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83jzopvsgj.fsf@gnu.org> <87bka0hpto.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83il48x4a8.fsf@gnu.org> <875y08gikv.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32844"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 68006@debbugs.gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 05 12:26:40 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rLiLY-0008KN-Cr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 12:26:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLiLG-0002LY-UF; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 06:26:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLiKu-0002IM-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 06:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLiKr-0000GY-SB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 06:25:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLiKw-0008JI-3N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 06:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 11:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68006 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68006-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68006.170445394731922 (code B ref 68006); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 11:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2024 11:25:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56530 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLiKg-0008Io-RE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 06:25:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41466) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLiKd-0008IY-CP for 68006@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 06:25:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLiKQ-0000Ay-Lc; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 06:25:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Svw7jbnJjY/sd8MVT/gwBIMNJaP8qBlSCEyLEsxi1nE=; b=ZLuHLM4okULq GrWHgORv/n5kOiFiqtl45YQPNrx2ZamS/pxXBAiLrJMnl8yJ44SI35U8IBQuzS0lpyT5WBFZpHpT8 pRow2bsZRFd5xvbWe1jjSECeUMVoGOkFw086RYKqRby2RW1j+A8hDZ8mINkcUVIqnHu+QRz4B21t3 C/k8qrpZM08tJgr+HVGZAfkrV9AJOHFeAyJMABxyu2BzeBn9ObOABchnsTHh11PhAF4sMsW2qpuGU /IvQ3EoL4TX8fnchaTr8Rl8G/8WAOhiix0XPWVEW+BQKKD8U0e/XhOEM7CX/skU/o8r/oUnb/Ekf/ 9jR6jSfIHVMQ45dX4/Xi0w==; In-Reply-To: <875y08gikv.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> (message from Manuel Giraud on Fri, 05 Jan 2024 11:50:24 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277379 Archived-At: > From: Manuel Giraud > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 68006@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 11:50:24 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Ok. Maybe we should re-use the current C cache code with a "nice" > >> interface for this too. > > > > Yes, that can be done. > > Ok. More thinking: my idea is to have an interface to create/destroy > image caches and feed/query them. And why not have a Lisp interface to > it so something like image-mode could use this to manage its own cache. Yes, of course. We have a Lisp API for the existing cache as well, but this new one will need it much more, since we basically rely on the Lisp programs to manage this new cache. > > But we might need to store additional information there, like the > > buffer of the image, for example. > > I don't understand. Where do you think that the buffer of the image > should be stored? In the cache, together with the image, I think. How else would the Lisp programs know which images "belong" to them, and when to uncache them? I guess some other information relevant to the cache-removal decision will also need to be stored there.