From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network Security Manager merge time? Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:28:38 +0100 Organization: not if I can help it Message-ID: <82r3wzxfp5.fsf@oracle.com> References: Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416419129 20820 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2014 17:45:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 19 18:45:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr9Jk-0007vd-7z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:45:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59963 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr9Jj-0006Kn-RH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr9Jb-0006Jw-CT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:45:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr9JV-0003sm-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:45:15 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr9JV-0003sV-AD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:45:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr950-0007fa-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:30:10 +0100 Original-Received: from vav06-1-78-207-202-9.fbx.proxad.net ([78.207.202.9]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:30:10 +0100 Original-Received: from rpluim by vav06-1-78-207-202-9.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:30:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: vav06-1-78-207-202-9.fbx.proxad.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (cygwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DAh50XFdLJnDAVKL0+Q5nVCgemg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177791 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think the NSM is basically feature complete (i.e., it does what it's > supposed to according to our discussions). Bugs probably exist, as in > all code. > > So perhaps it's time to merge it with trunk? `nsm-security-level' would > be set to `low', which means that it basically would do nothing. > > But we would get more testing of the basic parts -- that I haven't > screwed up Emacs too much. And then, after a week or so, we could > switch it to `medium', which would activate it, and then we'll see what > people think about the way it works. I've just tried it in 'paranoid' mode, and whilst gnus can connect to gmane, (modulo the warnings about a self-signed certificate), my other nntp server news.eternal-september.org is getting denied. Which bits of .gnus etc would you like? Robert