From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Mendler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53981: 28.0.91; shortdoc: Add support for outline-minor-mode Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:29:58 +0100 Message-ID: <82d64c11-d25e-d42a-e309-4b8ec3577df8@daniel-mendler.de> References: <87czjpso5q.fsf@gnus.org> <266fd04d-b3c7-2eec-82b2-dbece8988704@daniel-mendler.de> <87o839r0po.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2124"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 53981@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 14 16:15:49 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJd4v-0000Ll-PJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:15:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43558 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJd4u-0006Fm-P4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:15:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJcNa-0000D0-Qx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJcNa-0008Lf-Gt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJcNa-0006Ma-A5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Mendler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53981 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53981-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53981.164484901021207 (code B ref 53981); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53981) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2022 14:30:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJcMj-0005Vh-Fg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from server.qxqx.de ([178.63.65.180]:60299 helo=mail.qxqx.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJcMh-0005QQ-5A for 53981@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:30:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qxqx.de; s=mail1392553390; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MI4JsYzrgl5A462+ES+btCdXK8xPt4XpTVgOuLS9/tQ=; b=XeLc4SFZXvTwRmcbNkLm5SrB2V lMOc6NYGdgDR2Cc0hplNLZGj+y6VPcniAG/4WZLETKOzpUiK+y3Nq3Jh0NgMwNj2qmpjDrI/Y2VMP h6LVRZ/97wz0tt7z2V4Kh82vdXAxA0qJWUqnPnviBMbRn5hF88uaxo1RgBYUlzBBCc+U=; Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87o839r0po.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:226890 Archived-At: On 2/14/22 15:18, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> With this setting, the separator line generally looks better and less >> obtrusive. So we may want to consider using no background and >> `:underline t` instead? With outline mode folding the separator line is >> still visible, but doesn't disturb the visuals so severely. > > I think the separator line looks fine the way it is, so if we're to > enable outline-minor-mode in that buffer, the outlining will have to be > adjusted to take that into account. If you want to keep the separator as is, I am not sure if we can solve the outline display issue, since it is an artifact of the current separator face. Maybe it would help to introduce an additional line of small height after the separator line, such that an outline-folded block will not end with the separator line? I like to have good outline support since it also helps with commands like my `consult-outline` and `counsel-outline`, which can be used to browse and export a TOC. For me, there is more to outlines than folding only. But overall I don't feel strongly about this - it is a minor feature. I can just keep outline support in my user config in combination with the single pixel separator lines, which looks better. ;) Daniel