Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

[Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>]

Hi Paul,

I think we can easily have both,  I can do the coding based on your  
function, this is a small change.

- Carsten

On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Paul R wrote:

>
> Carsten> If Paul agrees, and if he has signed the papers with the FSF,
> Carsten> we can integrate his code into Org-mode.
>
> I do agree and I do have assigned copyrights to the FSF, but from the
> technical point of view I would prefer to see plain anonymous  
> footnotes
> as explained above. I might implement it myself in case everybody  
> agrees
> on it but nobody has time for it.
>
> Can others express their views on pros and cons of the two following
> usages :
>
> * Usage 1, anonymous footnotes
>
> Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands
> from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenpō[fn:: Kenpo is the
> name of several martial arts]. It is primarily a striking art using
> punching, kicking, knee and elbow strikes and open-handed techniques
> such as knife-hands and ridge-hands.
>
> Grappling, locks, restraints, throws, and vital point strikes are  
> taught
> in some styles. A karate practitioner is called a karateka.
>
>
> * Usage 2, keyword named footnotes
>
> Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands
> from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenpō[fn:kenpo]. It is
> primarily a striking art using punching, kicking, knee and elbow  
> strikes
> and open-handed techniques such as knife-hands and ridge-hands.
>
> [fn:kenpo] Kenpo is the name of several martial arts
>
> Grappling, locks, restraints, throws, and vital point strikes are  
> taught
> in some styles. A karate practitioner is called a karateka.
>
> -- 
>  Paul