From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:29:35 +0530 Message-ID: <81sjrb6vqw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <010001cc29eb$fc806cb0$f5814610$@cs.ua.edu> <87zkljcxg4.fsf@gmail.com> <877h8niao3.fsf@gmail.com> <8739jbxpjh.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308147653 16933 80.91.229.12 (15 Jun 2011 14:20:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:20:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 15 16:20:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWqxc-0000ee-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:20:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44250 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWqxb-0000Pi-Ew for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:20:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWqdP-0003Th-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWqdO-0005fk-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pv0-f169.google.com ([74.125.83.169]:51516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWqdN-0005ff-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:53 -0400 Original-Received: by pvc12 with SMTP id 12so385421pvc.0 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:59:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=zdvhMGOh4MqTWw8VG7smztsOpAWL80sc1NA5gt7R63I=; b=KufxaSGGaweG61leHSFjWm4/dOdfZsyLYZdoP0d9TjloaAGSDd4USEhbzsZIb3DH+X YWIdAro2SG1ufNJCrfzbHJSaS+38qOiN/HI22PWSqc5HvVvLee7touRLujm7I8HtDWec YGjK8d/0TzJKV5qcpVG8Bv6/tRSuFH4opIXcE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=dpWXRK/bUHgy7RU0iRjy+6I0Wqm6R2UJjVVGq3XK909/Uz4pb1KFrdbDSbbOqmrx6x OmULATCWlRGE+d+zuO82lz4LsWhuU/kAt3N3cwi6TEN69noJY5tzTTAzO9aXQIjSzEDU n5KB4HbN5AQAFKINYDmos/Z4XqiHnt5QmmCYQ= Original-Received: by 10.68.8.136 with SMTP id r8mr254407pba.498.1308146391748; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:59:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from JAMBU-NETBOOK ([115.184.74.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y2sm306689pbi.51.2011.06.15.06.59.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <8739jbxpjh.fsf@gmail.com> (Antoine Levitt's message of "Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:11:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.83.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140497 Archived-At: Antoinne > I just think that trying to force an agenda on such a survey is > essentially useless. Richard has built the Free Software Movement much by living it and much more by pure exhortation. Exhortation has it's value though it may not work against one Antoinne Leavitt. > I just have to cross the street and ignore it You cannot even live up to what you are just saying right now. By writing the mail in first place you have only shown that your words don't align with your actions == Lack Of Integrity. Sorry, Jambunathan K. --