From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA Submission] OpenDocumentText exporter for Orgmode Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:52:32 +0530 Message-ID: <81oc1vww6f.fsf@gmail.com> References: <81zkllh423.fsf@gmail.com> <87wrgoe7k0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <81lix4p4ac.fsf@gmail.com> <81zklki0gr.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308374515 25653 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2011 05:21:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 05:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 18 07:21:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXnyf-00084Z-Uk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 07:21:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57769 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXnye-0003Iq-84 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:21:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXnyR-0003Ii-1k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:21:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXnyQ-0001F9-4r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:21:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:55264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXnyP-0001F2-UF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so2890643pzk.0 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:21:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=mHQGBAokfpM09423CobCQ8hB8FvmoajrANUG16gWezI=; b=PRHyhVYKas6Wov9n+dE+YSh7w3G275mpwxzbIM+qniRPd5FCQ2TD/rJHlMITXDs3wT Y2VXdZ5QHuZCv73OH18vQM5CDnhmFnco0h6E3ZzRsLINU9TBw9ogfgOWfy/TqhWJA5Vs Kuj0yLc0Z7hUgM/MUEu5/sf53umIP4nn3b49M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=p/AfapfDbp6Az+qQm5G+JSShbeL88XrdhGLLvW2RY83qSKez+xsQBqFppzyPlJfrtq 5zeG389jkzE7jxIXEI5nXt3XcJmazdBHvajAn86XqXdA/CRsfvaIUfJQKz4IZ0qqsqXf ny7OfFcS4uoMWZc/HBhfY5asuEs8xt43ucUfQ= Original-Received: by 10.143.20.11 with SMTP id x11mr510104wfi.229.1308374492868; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from JAMBU-NETBOOK ([122.164.64.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g2sm329516pbh.63.2011.06.17.22.21.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:15:21 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140643 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> org-html.el is split in to a generic export driver and a html-specific >> formatter. The changes are here big and diffused that a simple diff >> would simply be not that helpful. (Currently both these modules reside >> within org-html.el) > >> org-odt.el is dependent on the core driver that is part of org-html.el. > >> There are other tiny changes to org.el, org-footnote.el and org-exp.el. > > I suggest you divide your changes into a few patches you can push > independently which refactor the existing org code, with the end result > that your new org-odt.el doesn't need extra changes elsewhere. > > Also, in order to speed things up, only submit one small patch at > a time, otherwise the maintainers will tend to be overwhelmed reviewing > a large patch and will let it linger for a long time. Ok. I think we will work out something. I hope you would consider my request of having the org-odt tarball in GNU archives. The advantage would be that more people could discover it and test drive it. Jambunathan K. > > > Stefan > > --