From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] package-x.el: package-upload-buffer-internal Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:33:49 +0530 Message-ID: <81mxpsbhx6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <81pquvqtms.fsf@gmail.com> <87tyk1rqs8.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <814oc16jk0.fsf@gmail.com> <87bp68afky.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288663563 25572 80.91.229.12 (2 Nov 2010 02:06:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 02:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 02 03:05:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PD6G7-0007Wd-7X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:05:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49841 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PD6G5-0005iR-Pn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:05:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42303 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PD6G0-0005iL-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:05:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PD6Fz-0004OO-Fh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:05:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:58102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PD6Fz-0004OK-8F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so4501232gyh.0 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:05:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=bgZF/jxxB88o0QfF8yH6Kg9CwWM0kG3jnOz3phx5/6I=; b=Tx4FmrDAj6hv+n/tt+RpARzow9lkS+V5uZ2TsIPCZrOawu5JLQZIub/Ru0cPOO4BXw feNCr8M5xZPUCKosYbk/lNRFP5mkGXSdfvEJsCmBVm8VYNqQRTse2PE2iQC2192ejqOQ e2HVmDqfn2dA8tkm7wz2OqXfghKTQQXvkyrvk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=DrgswK1ywd+7JkRxdZgrDQL8zy1mP0qbDtExQ8fimLyFFwB6gbs3cNAA8bxxSytGlG GGB/Kd7vOAtVwk1fyY19Gh28ut2hbk3o4rUUyQBoTfDzuIU540bzcU0P5Jf/tJT8WGtd GBAtHoW8bSUSBgXQ01JLHHZVsZ/N0UI7helF8= Original-Received: by 10.151.113.12 with SMTP id q12mr17571866ybm.111.1288663550301; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from JAMBU-NETBOOK ([115.242.175.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i9sm5811865yha.42.2010.11.01.19.04.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:05:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bp68afky.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:39:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132264 Archived-At: Chong Chong Yidong writes: > Jambunathan K writes: > >> The assumption I make is that 'package-archive-upload-base' points to >> the 'pub' dir of the webserver. It is the 'archive-contents' in this dir >> that the webserver is essentially going to serve. So 'archive-contents' >> retrieved through the URL would be the same as that read from >> 'package-archive-base'. > > But there's no harm in doing that, other than a tiny bit of wasted > effort, is there? > I take that the word 'that' here refers to 'the other thing than that which "this" patch introduces' - which is to download from URL. Yes, I wasn't fixing a bug. I was merely suggesting minor improvements. Jambunathan K.