From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20489: 25.0.50; next-error-find-buffer chooses non-current buffer without good reason Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 03:54:55 +0200 Message-ID: <81d36dbe-f563-187a-ec16-df4b051ae204@yandex.ru> References: <86wq0q602w.fsf@yandex.ru> <877ev36pmr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sha1nbjy.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <23fd061a-9b83-742a-6083-6d2f090b8f22@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519696454 24166 195.159.176.226 (27 Feb 2018 01:54:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:54:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0 Cc: 20489@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 02:54:09 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqUT3-0005lU-BF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 02:54:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34300 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqUV5-0002GP-Ov for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:56:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqUUw-0002F8-3C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqUUs-0000Ck-W3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqUUs-0000Ce-Rp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqUUs-0006o6-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20489 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20489-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20489.151969650726104 (code B ref 20489); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20489) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2018 01:55:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqUTz-0006mx-3x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:55:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:52435) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqUTx-0006mR-0i for 20489@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id t3so21012847wmc.2 for <20489@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:55:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dsCEoBtzTtsRcmNslM8ubKVo7SendrqwdYgfTIepL/k=; b=tMLOhiMbFs/9+5CHxyzDZVDn9967hmrkyuB3E45/TJS9D+b0X53WgVJhLxFDY8rjWl nSr5elS6+u5iDP2qbOCxqKYaPhRkw/xQxmXHY2/umR5712kfero8pFxcjlGW1JNLKoQc vqxdCuQAkUkV1oIkrs9t0a3Tu2FTJg6YR4NsdIEfk51esHGDfw4hvp1ql3EedKpe0NAI Z/eE0uFHaVnqrlXwdkOKYmdsrwg3RUcu4wTgTrnD3pM8AQwzKNjGpDJdyPk/yzg3tc60 hEjAzvcf8ilD+FMTmWvEwTyUBfGIIXmGrgrYeDnyY4vMWfSdyLxzF7K99OjNbfXpl//R K9RQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dsCEoBtzTtsRcmNslM8ubKVo7SendrqwdYgfTIepL/k=; b=nk3wre3nn9Di211RmlRQOJYKsgzMC4TS84Meh+y6NMrGIoCkVWleWnQOAlxzBbA5Wk lAliWapSHKehOSUi6mPkiAy7beCFZ5FfqPsyPKjklCGhdMXxklH0CjxdOp6ZMTqnmz5I ZSzt97xaQF/Gbn2arPFMfvbEpz4MQ9o1QDRRPOiCcCUMKyveDrhZoyWnUMIKq+Yg/9qc zRXwMOSwv7Jmp3NCCnFpIwma7yyBHGnDJTSHGKA5GAsHXW/sSysN7k2kQ6vDQst6V+e9 XCFdx4ACewexr8u7DJN8gEbrXH7obxGhBTVv6jSjatjhyEbjOinGgd1B9EI/WhX9aO7J 6NyA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPABA//ih3rnK9HjEClEsC8EvVuetAWh8Eq1EXDSMnE4ZCsMec43 9R3Nm7iBfPExxNnYSNGspZ2M3H+s X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuWBVOLbFW+ietdfCJlekf66AkwgYYpAcU0TnOeKT/QK7hgPxbT55hB8IHtcMlb0dz83EFKxA== X-Received: by 10.28.167.208 with SMTP id q199mr9740057wme.29.1519696498923; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:54:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o9sm14887820wrf.43.2018.02.26.17.54.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:54:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <23fd061a-9b83-742a-6083-6d2f090b8f22@yandex.ru> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:143689 Archived-At: On 2/27/18 3:21 AM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > Further, I'm not sure I like bug#20489 being closed with this patch > only. Even if it worked 100%, it doesn't address everything that came up > in that discussion. Bug#28864 being closed is fine, and indeed that > scenario has been addressed. Actually, I retract this. next-error-select-buffer should address the other major pain point, as soon as the basics work fine. On that subject: why did we make next-error-last-buffer always buffer-local?