From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 6cd5678: Clarify compiler-pacifier in frame.c
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:09:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81c10429-fb09-1e6a-0ab5-aca38fc3691e@cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83a7bvg4a2.fsf@gnu.org>
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> This is backwards: it would mean we should use UNINIT all over the
> place just to be sure we will be able to spot some imaginary bugs by
> flipping a compiler switch.
That's not what UNINIT is for. It should be used only to pacify GCC. If GCC is
happy with plain 'int x;' then UNINIT should not be used.
Furthermore, these use-before-set bugs are not "imaginary". In the typical case
where GCC's -Wmaybe-uninitialized diagnostics are not false alarms, they are
quite useful in spotting and fixing use-before-set bugs. I've fixed many that
way myself, typically in my working copy as I develop code. Indeed, 'configure'
enables -Wmaybe-uninitialized precisely because its utility outweighs its cost
of a few false alarms and resulting need to use UNINIT or unnecessary
initializations.
UNINIT can improve debugging, whereas unnecessary initializations can make the
code look nicer. There's a tradeoff here, and different developers have
different preferences of course. Developers who don't use tools that can take
advantage of UNINIT may not appreciate or value its advantages.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-26 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-24 6:14 [Emacs-diffs] master 6cd5678: Clarify compiler-pacifier in frame.c Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-25 0:52 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-25 7:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-26 6:34 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-26 7:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-26 8:15 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-26 9:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-26 15:21 ` Óscar Fuentes
2019-08-26 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-26 18:20 ` Óscar Fuentes
2019-08-26 18:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-26 19:09 ` Paul Eggert [this message]
2019-08-26 19:15 ` Óscar Fuentes
2019-08-26 19:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-26 19:49 ` Óscar Fuentes
2019-08-26 22:33 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-27 6:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-27 7:28 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-27 8:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-27 9:28 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-27 10:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-27 12:05 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-27 12:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-26 18:50 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-26 18:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-26 23:17 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81c10429-fb09-1e6a-0ab5-aca38fc3691e@cs.ucla.edu \
--to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.