[REGRESSION] Description List + HTML

[REGRESSION] Description List + HTML

[Jambunathan K]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 302 bytes --]


My head is at git commit 6a369 and 

With `emacs -Q', do a C-c C-e h on bug.org. 

See that the following paragraph (or whatever!)

"But in the end, no individual scenes matter but the film as a whole.
Important actors in this film are"

is NOT within any HTML tags and is floating. 

Jambunathan K.


[-- Attachment #2: bug.org --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 908 bytes --]

* Lists
** A Very Complex List
*** Lord of the Rings

    My favorite scenes are (in this order)
    1. The attack of the Rohirrim
    2. Eowyn's fight with the witch king
       + this was already my favorite scene in the book
       + I really like Miranda Otto.
         - Definition-1 :: Description-1
         - Definition-2 :: Description-2
			   
			   
    3. Peter Jackson being shot by Legolas
       He makes a really funny face when it happens.
       - on DVD only
	 
	 
    But in the end, no individual scenes matter but the film as a whole.
    Important actors in this film are:
    - Elijah Wood :: He plays Frodo
    - Sean Austin :: He plays Sam, Frodo's friend.  I still remember
		     him very well from his role as Mikey Walsh in
		     The Goonies
		     
      - Embedded Definition 1 :: Embedded Description 1
      - Embedded Definition 2 :: Embedded Description 2
	   
	   
    

[-- Attachment #3: bug.html --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 5214 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 5 bytes --]


-- 

Re: [REGRESSION] Description List + HTML

[Nicolas]

Hello,

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> My head is at git commit 6a369 and 
>
> With `emacs -Q', do a C-c C-e h on bug.org. 
>
> See that the following paragraph (or whatever!)
>
> "But in the end, no individual scenes matter but the film as a whole.
> Important actors in this film are"
>
> is NOT within any HTML tags and is floating.

I don't see anything wrong here. What would you expect instead?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas

Re: [REGRESSION] Description List + HTML

[Jambunathan K]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]

Nicolas <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> My head is at git commit 6a369 and 
>>
>> With `emacs -Q', do a C-c C-e h on bug.org. 
>>
>> See that the following paragraph (or whatever!)
>>
>> "But in the end, no individual scenes matter but the film as a whole.
>> Important actors in this film are"
>>
>> is NOT within any HTML tags and is floating.
>
> I don't see anything wrong here. What would you expect instead?

Validation with nxml mode is succeeding. So the document is
well-formed. But it does look strange to me.

Anyways, I am attaching the same file exported with release_7.3. You
would notice that the disputed text is enclosed within <p> </p>.

Would you consider enclosing them in paragraph tags. 

Odt exporter pretty much does tag mapping from html->odt. Absence of
these paragraph elements prevents their counterparts - <text:p>
</text:p> from being emitted in my odt exporter. This in turn causes
malformed OpenDocumentText document.

I am in the process of merging my odt changes to the master branch and
am ironing out last minute glitches ...

Jambunathan K.


[-- Attachment #2: bug.html --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 5258 bytes --]

Re: [REGRESSION] Description List + HTML

[Nicolas]

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> Validation with nxml mode is succeeding. So the document is
> well-formed. But it does look strange to me.

I may help if you would elaborate.

> Anyways, I am attaching the same file exported with release_7.3. You
> would notice that the disputed text is enclosed within <p> </p>.
>
> Would you consider enclosing them in paragraph tags.

I've pushed a fix in that direction. Is it correct now?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas

Re: Re: [REGRESSION] Description List + HTML

[Jambunathan K]

Nicolas

>> Would you consider enclosing them in paragraph tags.
>
> I've pushed a fix in that direction. Is it correct now?

Thanks for this. Verified that my test file exports fine.

Jambunathan K.

--