From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 859190f 2/3: Convert some keymaps to defvar-keymap Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:28:17 +0000 Message-ID: <818f9907c244b9db0bea@heytings.org> References: <20211004081724.6281.11798@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211004081727.4F24921048@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <871r4qcs8s.fsf@gnus.org> <87o87ubcnl.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7dm9en7.fsf@gnus.org> <818f9907c2b1fe8b54b1@heytings.org> <83tuhlnkxm.fsf@gnu.org> <818f9907c2f359a71f49@heytings.org> <83czo9nj4g.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9465"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 13 16:29:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mafFu-0002As-5i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:29:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mafFt-0008MM-8U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mafEz-0007fG-Hc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:49334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mafEx-00017W-OI; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:28:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1634135297; bh=z9HwwSI7obO5AH5fKeqPWWzhj37yXhh89GGSnGfEdGg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=PT6JrqTQ6M0K51P5NbMbGC52oZfrJuzWsDOrThxlGepJi6TAfpmFsOxjrMUtUJfFm vV2j4dSazsDBYU3cnbcvFZtfnq62dxN5lJsJBoHeSHHXHzZqMCG/V/ieyNaDjtmhMP bcuWeHbURcsXzaFDpKbHgXDG0qWPmVJ7Kkhw1taKUTmcHmL5ks74QTi44YjllErB+e ZfJOVBXBsCOAnc68IkCg40PHaP0zce/5ulZrxtE2n/GFasQt/6Ywx+6vhHkDIPKgi+ UW7In8xh3KWG/6bk+8GR/o3BOXIoeyv4dBc/9A4hY1HsVU1RCvzQfQjywvjBpK8cIs BX9sbG7dM1SJQ== In-Reply-To: <83czo9nj4g.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276907 Archived-At: >>> If the "kbd" call fails for some reason, safe_call1 will return nil, >>> and what will that do to the rest of the code? >> >> That code was a short proof of concept, to initiate a discussion. If >> the idea is okay, I'll work on it to fix this problem (and possibly >> others). > > Ah, okay. Apologies for my misunderstanding. > No need to apologize. But what do you (and others) think of the idea? It would be a (IMO elegant) way to "phase out strings (where every char represents an event)".