From: "Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Bug: Extra space inserted in repeated tasks' date line
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:25:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80obzmgb4f.fsf@somewhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: B09980FA-A091-434A-8340-62CC5DFEF266@gmail.com
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>> On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>>>> Similar to this, I've noticed that sometimes the SCHEDULED line (or
>>>> DEADLINE, or ...) is moved synchronously with the heading when
>>>> promoting/demoting, sometimes not.
>>>>
>>>> I now found in which cases it does and when it does not: it depends on
>>>> the presence of text in the entry.
>>>
>>> It depends on the presence of *unindented* text in the entry,
>>> and purposefully so.
>>>
>>>> So, for example:
>>>>
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>> * The SCHED will be moved
>>>> SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>
>>>>
>>>> * This one won't be moved along with the heading
>>>> SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>
>>>>
>>>> Because of this text here...
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
A question: in the above headlines, as I see them in your reply, the 2 spaces
in front of SCHEDULED keyword are replaced by 1, which makes it difficult to
follow the conversation, as the example is not anymore showing what it was
supposed to.
My question is (to you or others): am I the one having the problem when
displaying your reply, or is it more on your side when answering to a post?
Don't lose time with this, but I'd like to (try to) patch this, if it's lying
on my side.
>> [...] The indentation of both SCHEDULED lines is not changed at all.
>>
>> I would like that their indentation would be changed with the heading, even if
>> I write all my body text starting in column 0.
>>
>> So, this is not currently handled, IIUC?
>>
>> The SCHEDULED lines don't have a different status than the "body text" for
>> indentation purpose ("follow-headline" or "stay-where-you-are")?
>
> They currently don't - but I see that this might makes sense to do differently.
OK. Thanks for your answer.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-15 12:02 Bug: Extra space inserted in repeated tasks' date line Markus Berlin
2011-08-18 7:55 ` Bastien
2011-08-18 8:22 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-08-18 8:25 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-08-18 9:04 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-08-18 10:02 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-08-18 12:25 ` Sebastien Vauban [this message]
2011-08-18 16:19 ` Bastien
2011-08-18 20:54 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-08-19 7:42 ` Bastien
2011-08-19 8:38 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-08-19 8:45 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80obzmgb4f.fsf@somewhere.org \
--to=wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7uqw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.