From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Bela=EFche?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NEWS entry for ses.el changes Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:12:23 +0100 Message-ID: <80haovtkmw.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352700760 20670 80.91.229.3 (12 Nov 2012 06:12:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:12:40 +0000 (UTC) To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org , Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 12 07:12:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TXnGM-0001Xm-71 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:12:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXnGC-0000YV-LS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:12:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXnG7-0000W0-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:12:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXnG4-0003U4-Lz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:12:35 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp06.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.128]:40972 helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXnG4-0003Tv-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:12:32 -0500 Original-Received: from CHOUNEK ([92.139.227.66]) by mwinf5d29 with ME id NWCW1k00S1SbQck03WCX23; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:12:31 +0100 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121111-1, 11/11/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.12.242.128 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154828 Archived-At: [...] > > To the extent that the code on emacs-24 is feature-frozen, the remaining > > change had better be a clear bug-fix. > > > > > > Stefan > > > > Is it a bug that the mode line is not refreshed, or is it a missing > feature ? > > Vincent. > I understand that in `*clear* bug-fix', `clear' means that you consider it a missing feature not a bug-fix, and therefore that addition of mode-line refresh after cell renaming should not go to emacs-24. Correct? FYI the mode line becomes correct after you go away from this cell and then come back again to it, so the cell indication is false only immediately after the renaming. But the other changes which I did on trunk only are really bug fixes, ses-rename-cell on emacs-24 is quite a bit defunct. On the other hand, since it is not documented neither in the manual nor in NEWS, should I really do something ? In the latter case, I had rather port all the changes once the feature is completely stable. Vincent.