From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Kupfer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22692: 25.0.91; xref-find-definitions fails to prompt Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:10:45 -0800 Message-ID: <8099.1455894645@allegro.localdomain> References: <20283.1455584523@allegro.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455894685 22014 80.91.229.3 (19 Feb 2016 15:11:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22692@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 16:11:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aWmi9-0008NX-Un for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 16:11:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53019 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWmi5-00043X-W4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWmi2-000421-GY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:11:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWmhz-0002EI-0k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWmhy-0002E4-Du for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWmhy-0002ZY-80 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mike Kupfer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22692 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22692-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22692.14558946499870 (code B ref 22692); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22692) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2016 15:10:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWmhl-0002Z6-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:10:49 -0500 Original-Received: from shell1.rawbw.com ([198.144.192.42]:53013 ident=root) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWmhj-0002Yy-LM for 22692@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:10:48 -0500 Original-Received: from allegro.localdomain (m208-249.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.208.249]) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id u1JFAjsi056596; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:10:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.kupfer@acm.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host m208-249.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.208.249] claimed to be allegro.localdomain In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:43:57 +0200." <56C71C1D.8010502@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 25.0.91 Content-ID: <8098.1455894645.1@allegro.localdomain> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113298 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 02/17/2016 03:55 AM, Mike Kupfer wrote: > > Does "valid identifier" mean syntatically correct, or does it mean that > > the identifier is in the tags table. Please clarify the documentation. > > We probably should just remove the word "valid" from there. Yes, I think that's the right fix. I'll review and respond to the other points you made, but it will probably take me a couple of days to get to it. thanks, mike