From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: James Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24285: 25.1; Overlay doesn't work as expected when more than one frame exists Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:29:11 -0700 Message-ID: <80193592-896D-4250-ADDE-6F1837E105DF@gmail.com> References: <57BAB3BC.9060202@gmx.at> <87shtwomkr.fsf@web.de> <834m6chljh.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2f8om46.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471883503 22469 195.159.176.226 (22 Aug 2016 16:31:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24285@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 22 18:31:34 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbs8L-0005DU-9H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:31:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42311 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbs8I-0005Pn-G6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:31:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbs6x-0004aD-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbs6t-0005hG-Ct for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbs6t-0005gx-9E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbs6t-0004Wi-1p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:30:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: James Nguyen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24285 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24285-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24285.147188336217323 (code B ref 24285); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24285) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2016 16:29:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbs6E-0004VJ-D3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:29:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:33988) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbs6C-0004V6-Cc for 24285@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:29:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l203so158862395oib.1 for <24285@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:29:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZYBtXGl/o2TNwTCloDGaCFqWiybVa1c74D8bE4yd08E=; b=quJl6IFVU1n15r+CVmSh1Jgl6QCa6ZYEE7bHAC4gFdZzTf+/u0bQRBQZZlpAiC/mES pRsIrFDFHBWMiEL+ShZAfS7HNXGvG9AQw+kq+m7Oq2uENv6IRt+hq/q5FUTJhBPPETJF TgSFlL2HzuPyW/5OFA8BXKu6YySst+qchB7nebLcigu0moWJS/XPoqKyxzTnu9PmVWoe n1a7Is/ZZPuSGs/9gz9Ai8pOX8fi6i0ct1pdYgfAGBvuiDNuERn3MVqgFahsTsGnwIiy 9sNToNBXrsQZhBLogZfFv4mEGJR7RKU6CURMGd2iAgWOcDXKFcdSni1fV/BKHtw45YAR wmDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZYBtXGl/o2TNwTCloDGaCFqWiybVa1c74D8bE4yd08E=; b=AI6P+oAU8/iT613qMvHKd5HlkK+rK11CBa0QeV7gEUwWcr/JZW1BOd5m98Vtc+cPhL hfLhgdeDHtx4k4uPgvxeoaQJpSnDfBdLi28UVNrwhlXsd1lT1x/Mxggpelt9QxuGddBD MBhB1uI+xaLbuiXI1Dtt9FZtvvFYKuusQI5m67T7QIHo9P+TpxEoE3Fs9SegmmwTsYir 6TyTjE5nAaCftsXTqqiUy7+TNFm2FIKZE/Ik/MMvmrrSASfCVrnqbb+AZHflfcvvrOZ9 0c8H8caL15lnjgxzMaf4LEDRiLEz7mY859jYVayvr4N/3DGVLDK88UvCOA11/Xaj8LmV e2aw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuWL762cX/EtQusqiex+bZQNmKQ/YWqrCUgRo7dazcnJnfyci4sPeC/nT8e9bR3iw== X-Received: by 10.157.24.71 with SMTP id t7mr14007641ott.87.1471883354483; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from jamesretina.attlocal.net (107-131-122-243.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [107.131.122.243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w124sm11784195oiw.19.2016.08.22.09.29.12 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:29:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k2f8om46.fsf@web.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122504 Archived-At: The expected behavior for me is that the minibuffer resizes regardless = of how many frames are up. When the frame count is 1, the minibuffer resizes as expected but adding = a new frame causes the resizing to not show up (on either frame). Closing one frame (going back to frame count of 1) lets me see the = expected resizing. > On Aug 22, 2016, at 8:32 AM, Michael Heerdegen = wrote: >=20 > Eli Zaretskii writes: >=20 >> What exactly do you see then? All I see is that the minibuffer >> doesn't get resized, but once I move the cursor there, I see the >> entire overlay. Is that what you see? >=20 > What I see can be interpreted in that way, yes. >=20 > BTW, AFAIR the other recipe I posted is also related to mini-window > resizing. >=20 >=20 > Michael.