From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4922: Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:53:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7efb516c-c390-42ba-ac82-137a74967800@default> References: <912155b0911131258l4ca747fak13713f67db6ed60f@mail.gmail.com> <87lhwytbth.fsf@gnu.org> <84f54438-fe56-4273-8d58-7db203f250b3@default> <4c95c9be-779e-4817-ac5d-4014e6b83b58@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393430054 7284 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2014 15:54:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Xue Fuqiao , 4922@debbugs.gnu.org To: Per =?UTF-8?Q?Starb=C3=A4ck?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 26 16:54:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WIgoO-0002VG-Rl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:54:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41419 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIgoO-0001R5-Id for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:54:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIgoE-0001Gv-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:54:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIgo7-0001Kt-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:54:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIgo6-0001K1-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIgo6-00010k-GM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4922 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 4922-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4922.13934300043815 (code B ref 4922); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4922) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2014 15:53:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41464 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIgnT-0000zT-H9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:53:23 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:27933) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIgnQ-0000zI-Q1 for 4922@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:53:21 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s1QFrI76017714 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:53:19 GMT Original-Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1QFrHDC018103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:53:18 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0007.oracle.com (abhmp0007.oracle.com [141.146.116.13]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1QFrHYs019841; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:53:17 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86261 Archived-At: > >> > And AFAICT it does seem to be fixed. Should it be closed? > >> > > >> > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D16216 > >> > >> That 16216 is a duplicate of this bug, isn't it? Since it is fixed the > >> original is also fixed. > > > > Yes, except it is the other way around. AFAICT, that bug (and > > so this one) has already been fixed. > > > > But perhaps Fuqiao is seeing something different and there is > > still a bug somewhere. > > As the original reporter from 2011 I maintain that that is the > original, and not the one from last December. What I meant with "since > it is fixed the original is also fixed" was that it was the copy that > finally triggered the fix. I see what you are saying. AFAICT: 1. Yes, 16216 is a duplicate of 4922 (I had it backward; sorry). 2. Yes, it was the duplicate, 16216 that triggered fixing (by Eli). 3. Yes, it seems to be fixed. 4. But we should perhaps wait to hear from Fuqiao wrt whether he can repro it with the latest code. If he can confirm that this is fixed, 4922 and 16216 can be closed (no?).