Re: [screenshot] Emacs instant colors (and the Elisp full cycle)

[Rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com>]

On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 6:16:30 AM UTC+5:30, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Rusi  writes:
> 
> > When I visit it, it does not do all the colorfulness
> > of your screenshot And cant load it because there're
> > all sorts of your own requires out there.
> 
> You only need `font-lock-add-keywords'. If you read
> the documentation, you find out that what I did is
> exactly what it does! That way you also find out
> I didn't do anything else and the requires are
> unrelated. See?
> 
> > Anyways... 'seriously man'... fontlock technicolor
> > is not my priority
> 
> It is rather to be able to solve simple problems by
> examining code and documentation peace and quiet and
> not get discouraged at the first unknown encounter.
> 
> But I like "fontlock technicolor" :) Exactly.
> 
> > So I am not going to iterate over this... unless you
> > give me a version that splashes my screen with color
> > when called as $ emacs -Q emanuel-buffer.el
> 
> OK:
> 
>     http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/captain-mr-king.el
> 
> Invoke:
> 
>     emacs -Q -l captain-mr-king.el captain-mr-king.el
> 
> > [Or as I said earlier you can put the demo on that
> > python thread yourself]
> 
> Well, this isn't exactly an example of Lisp being
> a "programmable programming language". This is an
> example of Emacs being programmable in Elisp as well
> as a tool to write Elisp. The difference might (?) get
> subtile down below. The example that would prove the
> point should rather be a macro that changes the syntax
> of Lisp, for example `dotimes' - myself, I'm not
> a macro writer tho I use them (sometimes). Of course
> you may still use this example in any way you like.

Ive put it in -- check if its ok