From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Antipov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23912: 25.0.95; Abort in gc when working with streams Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 20:57:09 +0300 Message-ID: <7dcd2856-b9a4-9516-607a-1109d2be2dbc@yandex.ru> References: <87wpkxtmwg.fsf@web.de> <83poqpjro0.fsf@gnu.org> <87oa6973hi.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467914377 1646 80.91.229.3 (7 Jul 2016 17:59:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 17:59:37 +0000 (UTC) To: 23912@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 19:59:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDa8-0008A4-NX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 19:59:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41573 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDa7-0006Jq-JT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:59:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDYu-0005PP-V3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDYp-00037b-VI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDYo-00036u-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDYo-0004YH-Gw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Antipov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 17:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23912 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.146791425217460 (code B ref -1); Thu, 07 Jul 2016 17:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2016 17:57:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDYK-0004XY-8G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDYJ-0004XL-01 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:57:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDYD-00031H-2x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:57:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:51190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDYC-000314-TE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:57:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDYA-0004lo-O8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDY5-00030A-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:57:21 -0400 Original-Received: from forward5o.cmail.yandex.net ([37.9.109.249]:40977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLDY4-0002zU-Ed for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:57:17 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (smtp2o.mail.yandex.net [37.140.190.27]) by forward5o.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9744220E84 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 20:57:10 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 939EC36A0195 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 20:57:10 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: by smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 5iLKD1vt7Z-v9teFwI3; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 20:57:09 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1467914229; bh=5RDspagNSeY3BW81aSLWs3zH+jVn1uwizBqezjA2Eds=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To; b=iQS/2AoOSFax8RCWFxVNZYmKfBISSrwFjB2iP6SfAvXdYtmMXRCcI2s+GD4BX4OcW 4afgXtWnMz21AwxaesyCZnNTKqavsHTLra6HEjRVd24MvtARKIP3C4hcharVt0uLf7 Ds2GrV//LltavtYxuzJkZSXzQ6sSctFaFz2EYSJg= Authentication-Results: smtp2o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 In-Reply-To: <87oa6973hi.fsf@web.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120592 Archived-At: On 07/07/2016 08:38 PM, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > How do I build without optimization? Just change CFLAGS and add some run-time checking: CFLAGS='-O0 -g3' ./configure --enable-check-lisp-object-type --enable-checking=all > Is it bad that I called make with -j? No, this option just says make to spawn jobs in parallel. If you have different results with and without -j, probably there is a bug in Makefiles or make itself. Dmitry