From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to get "emacsclient --eval x" to DWIM when Emacs is not started Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:06:10 +0200 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0803301506rea1a2cua6dcf659568a6644@mail.gmail.com> References: <7dbe73ed0803301309t3de07534w9b86159192214e07@mail.gmail.com> <47EFF64F.7080408@gmail.com> <7dbe73ed0803301445l71af65f8ncd38cef5ef3971ad@mail.gmail.com> <47F00BA6.2090003@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206914792 31780 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2008 22:06:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 31 00:07:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jg5g7-0004ns-3J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:07:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jg5fV-0005qi-BN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:06:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jg5fQ-0005qE-GW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:06:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jg5fL-0005pb-5U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:06:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jg5fK-0005pY-UB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jg5fK-000727-1C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so1653372wah.10 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:06:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JN2W+IoHXYKinTu/CaWVf4ZEja9aEdsQgGTP/jp10eE=; b=YbwD1Bdfrh3cEGAo+ntKn0OvGslY0b4U+LQoheq9TnfA/J6SIVHSUscUPfAIFkydmmKwtxj9H/mTu0X2RwrYTz7JJDgq386J+i3ahEZNu5xce0S7OzBdLJTNgn/TUMUybk+a8K14vSvcp8KXD4nA6DgYRx8OlaamMBIYDmAuIf0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ser6K/7y50Y/8itZl8zP6I8Cr7OwUwlS9GDI8CCm9N0IDpGyZDBWn8w3flMrbXzV6yrdnimOap9XQUUwqKDumZPyNtVeHPqElpAczK2MfTz1eL6UVX8u7S26daZU3SOBHsMcFqRwo8pmDEFszDbF5AFy3WCD40dvfr8/aXEMC7I= Original-Received: by 10.114.112.1 with SMTP id k1mr8692429wac.24.1206914771018; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.146.9 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:06:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47F00BA6.2090003@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93963 Archived-At: > The current state of the patch is not the best, but it works. I have > problem keeping it in sync with CVS and have "unstructured" it to do > that. I am still waiting for some decision to take it into the CVS ... I know there was a lot of discussion about emacsclient some time back and I did not follow it very closely (it was too much), was this ever discussed and is there any good reason for this not working as I think most would expect?