From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Include buffer-move.el Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:01:30 +0200 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0708150001t7c6ad1b3k9a69de992db8b88b@mail.gmail.com> References: <87vebhzndq.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187161308 17930 80.91.229.12 (15 Aug 2007 07:01:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , sdl.web@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 15 09:01:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ILCsu-0007Td-QX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:01:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILCsu-00014k-Fu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:01:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILCsq-00012L-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:01:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILCsp-00010W-8w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:01:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILCsp-00010G-0d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:01:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ILCso-0004aM-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:01:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.188]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ILCsn-0007H8-8S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:01:33 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so1488666rvf for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:01:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XI9uMvomKJYqCvxDhVJsfV9kOHVIQBZUs+SYBKQvG5oao7OZ8ug3t6TR7/SpT6DNQCWoSU/pMmpvzimQCikhy5jjYInIdflKG86OIGBxTCcxqW0lumJvcKRNTiuEIYkkdKDfSqUin8Q1QKYBe2pV9B3/3yWSezHgLU0cGSP/26o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FojdTh5skdUF7FJb0PV9CvZ+vkJbNR5h1NK+3IAaVf8P/4djDp/uB14qOgBwwmAnEmQLGNQKeaDPXXTDSvovon7JVcqd9/KVBKeJwisvfONVkOKodvRfzER6ZWVK/I0EY6TGmdmehUAmZigtxUoQgTx4ffqj8iB1pSdzpA08b+U= Original-Received: by 10.141.202.12 with SMTP id e12mr76652rvq.1187161290939; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.141.172.10 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:01:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76550 Archived-At: > I think we should indeed add this functionality to windmove.el. A similar function was discussed a while ago in gnu.emacs.help (subject "rotate split windows") and a simple solution developed: http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.emacs.help/browse_thread/thread/5197a0895413ee6c/443d6b1f25e0c585?lnk=gst&q=rotate+buffer&rnum=2#443d6b1f25e0c585 The difference is that the buffers are rotated, so you cannot do exactly what buffer-move seems to do. I thought I should mention it however in case people like that better.