From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs manual mentioning thumbs mode but not tumme Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:43:29 +0200 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0704190643s42dfa2d7x4c7ff6afb2b7697d@mail.gmail.com> References: <87slb8szz9.fsf@debby.local.net> <87wt0frzs0.fsf@debby.local.net> <7dbe73ed0704161136k1f54e5c7j6e49b63504d7f0e4@mail.gmail.com> <7dbe73ed0704180502l764ed06ckbab38d16ae29ad37@mail.gmail.com> <864pncaeyc.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <7dbe73ed0704190546x7324d704iffd8beabb6bc9ad7@mail.gmail.com> <874pnc1o42.fsf@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176990225 970 80.91.229.12 (19 Apr 2007 13:43:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de, nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" To: "Markus Triska" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 19 15:43:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HeWvC-0007Ru-Ag for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:43:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeX09-00081t-1p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:48:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HeX05-00081U-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:48:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HeX03-00080p-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeX02-00080P-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:48:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.183]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HeWv5-0007RR-0n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:43:31 -0400 Original-Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b32so609535ika for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:43:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GHYaIspW1xx7FGu/7UahZkNzWyuTJRX5caoGugb24LXR2vreeqQmyh+hQp/BnJIp6ZVTLISviGiL67gV6fldFuI3NPuu/7ib/B8mFEa2C3F13N79pAayuqha4R+xJc72gaDUWKKaORrioIb5UDjD9Jb29/EJbYEMtM5LrHbs6xs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UMW3iGvSrwmZp7cgkDR3iYOOXkVV16CWwdBYkFnhM4T+j/SN0+mvGhniSp4QXjyGav2rQKY+LBUn+RTKf/iIhJ0k4ErQ1xzofOptcGPVwmaUt18ze3A7EbPENqkgFEFPtrcLVVV6V4b2eSt6BucYL0KrQaayzs1+IvoC/zlLJpQ= Original-Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr271989huf.1176990209952; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.12.17 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:43:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874pnc1o42.fsf@gmx.at> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69631 Archived-At: > > I guess, as Kim said, that something starting with "image" would be > > better > > I find that too specific, since thumbnails can be useful for other > types of files as well. There's already a tumme.el patch for video > files, and more types (PDF etc.) can be supported in the future. Hehe, OK :) In a way, you are correct. What tumme does is just display files, files that just happen to be images. I guess most of what it does can be applied to many types of files. Still, the primary use is images and I suspect that will be the case for a long time. But I might be wrong. Before you send your e-mail, I was about to comment on this, which David wrote: > image-dired, dired-image, vdired... Along those lines I think I like `image-browser' the best. /Mathias