From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs manual mentioning thumbs mode but not tumme Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:46:28 +0200 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0704190546x7324d704iffd8beabb6bc9ad7@mail.gmail.com> References: <87slb8szz9.fsf@debby.local.net> <876481t7mu.fsf@debby.local.net> <7dbe73ed0704130201n1c365d4cy9635c1e84886a710@mail.gmail.com> <87wt0frzs0.fsf@debby.local.net> <7dbe73ed0704161136k1f54e5c7j6e49b63504d7f0e4@mail.gmail.com> <7dbe73ed0704180502l764ed06ckbab38d16ae29ad37@mail.gmail.com> <864pncaeyc.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176986809 19661 80.91.229.12 (19 Apr 2007 12:46:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de, nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 19 14:46:42 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HeW21-0006Ds-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:46:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeW6y-0006tX-8H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:51:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HeW6u-0006pv-28 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HeW6s-0006mn-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:51:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeW6s-0006ma-D7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:51:38 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.225]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HeW1v-0008B8-4K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:46:31 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so566029wxc for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:46:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ak4STrQJGZzFLaSyF+PpNkDTRNRH64srXWa78DmytA2MC1ldOqbe2vh5QXlq8R/P5U/OAvKPRI2Gd/faUUg700ySxcTuv/hLVdBnF4S/5zleVpqEuJCbo/GkeQUEFGgHBuGOQRWXqug36qMxPVo4R65zo0OabLzy068o6jaizAw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dyi7mLPKhkEQSv3du0QJd9c2/R7cTuMQ4sLFPH9lD8yZhxj0ew45XPwOS7cfPdw4MCu3q0LT4Hs6dTqJ6rZGOQKMeA5hQtK23OfxyF7/Kwn9L+A5W4Cdl+9EJgcokG9KNcFoCu5HLaWGCq9q8fAnHa3xMG9G73fmu6H7RQ4muKk= Original-Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr254826huf.1176986789007; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.12.17 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:46:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <864pncaeyc.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69626 Archived-At: > However, "thumbs" does not seem like much of an advantage here, > either. Probably not what I'd be thinking of first. A good point. I have been so involved in all this, since I found that Thumbs did not suit my needs and I felt the itch to create Tumme, that I have taken for granted that "thumbs" is the best and the most logic name. And as a Emacs CVS user I didn't realize that neither Thumbs nor Tumme has been officially released as part of Emacs. I guess, as Kim said, that something starting with "image" would be better (although I like "tumme" best, because it is the cutest.. :-). Both Thumbs and Tumme do much more than just showing the thumbnails of images. Actually, the thumbnails themselves aren't what is important, the important thing is (or was for me) to have a nice way to browse and catalog, look at and maybe also manipulate images. On the other hand, how logical is the name `gnus'... :)