From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs manual mentioning thumbs mode but not tumme Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:36:35 +0200 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0704161136k1f54e5c7j6e49b63504d7f0e4@mail.gmail.com> References: <87slb8szz9.fsf@debby.local.net> <17947.65334.841905.101671@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17949.22877.645175.478069@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17950.43941.498605.877229@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <876481t7mu.fsf@debby.local.net> <7dbe73ed0704130201n1c365d4cy9635c1e84886a710@mail.gmail.com> <87wt0frzs0.fsf@debby.local.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176748611 32445 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2007 18:36:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nick Roberts , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Dieter Wilhelm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 16 20:36:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HdW4B-0007Sn-Uk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:36:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HdW8p-0005z5-14 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:41:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HdW8l-0005y5-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HdW8k-0005xd-Dv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:41:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HdW8k-0005xW-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:41:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HdW46-0005a6-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:36:38 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so1117997ugf for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:36:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Lu3quEyPGmnnQjHf0LACTp7iWRyL4Tv2LgRITbJdebPqaFw9dxguki1mCP6O0dM7blqc0o2Ma0MvO3BjwSig/dVkTlF2G0Nlv4cggWFwhNDYlXLOyXfcH/c5XpnlMJ6qku1uguqIx/nuSVs3b1LPeaJwAlN7e4cBTDMMYW27n+k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=St/i/T2GZwXrj8umaOJZc0ufaGMboStsMcJQ3CN7E0vbQLmYzb23ugtmy9RR8Lm8aBKsTcP70LKGHfzz5Xw3AkN+MzxiAaTDrMLgMWYJfeYUXkhPuOZzhuDMXU8b7EymxqYmV5uURD6ULmpBoE4nyzBbucgScmCd46VDJls8YBw= Original-Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr1146890hub.1176748595392; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.12.17 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:36:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87wt0frzs0.fsf@debby.local.net> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69503 Archived-At: > > don't think they were very good ones. The name, for example, could be > > changed. We could have an alias called `thumbs' which would call > > That would be a good idea. BTW, I'm curious, is there something offending by the word "tumme"? I made a quick google search and could not find anything special. I agree that "thumbs" is better, of course, or at least easier to find/guess. > I'll give you an example: I, personally, prefer the way tumme handles > the images when the size is bigger than the display buffer, it fits > the image to the buffer size. thumbs is displaying the image in the > original resolution, I'm damn sure that there are users out there who > would prefer it the thumbs' way. Then they could use C-u RET instead of just RET :) > But then: So are your arguments for removing the packages 8-). > thumbs.el is small and therefore would not eat lots of resources (I > guess). I'm not very concerned about disk space, I was mostly thinking about maintenace resources, but I won't argue about that anymore as we clearly have different opinions. /Mathias