Re: master 305dbc7 2/4: Move description of value to syntax-ppss function.

[Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>]

On 30.10.2019 17:22, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> Yes, the doc string certainly implies that they can be relied upon if
> you use that function instead.
> 
> On the other hand, perhaps I shouldn't have moved it --
> parse-partial-sexp is used a lot, too.  I was only seeing syntax-ppss
> everywhere, but I see that it's used less than 2x as much.

syntax-ppss is indeed the function that most consumers should call, but 
it's low-level enough that I never considered that to be a problem.

> So perhaps that patch should be reverted anyway.

That's what I would do.

> Or have the list in
> both functions.  Or, even better, stop saying
> 
> (if (nth 5 state)
>      (do-something-incomprehensible)
>    (do-something-else-incomprehensible))
> 
> everywhere and just add accessor functions already, so that the code
> becomes marginally more readable.  Because trying to make sense of it
> now is just too hard, and it doesn't have to be.

Someone should probably try to add that accessor thing, but also 
perf-test the result.