From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17330: files.el cd-absolute overcome false negative from file-executable-p Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 02:54:22 -0400 Message-ID: <7c4n0zsaqp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <41559D99-B080-4B34-B491-3A811FA9FEAE@bluewin.ch> <5364B437.2070106@bluewin.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399618514 11301 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2014 06:55:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 06:55:14 +0000 (UTC) To: 17330@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 09 08:55:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wiei3-0007Xv-JB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 08:55:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50949 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wiei3-0006Lz-9W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 02:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wiehz-0006Jf-Kt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 02:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wiehy-0004gf-UH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 02:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39166) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wiehy-0004gN-RM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 02:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wiehx-0003tP-U0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 02:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 06:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17330 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 17330-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17330.139961846614901 (code B ref 17330); Fri, 09 May 2014 06:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17330) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 May 2014 06:54:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WiehN-0003sE-8c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 02:54:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:41023 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WiehK-0003s4-Va for 17330@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 02:54:23 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WiehK-0006Iq-E0; Fri, 09 May 2014 02:54:22 -0400 X-Spook: Afghanistan North Korea Ansar al-Islam Majic Saudi Arabia X-Ran: _U]r38qvNF:<4x'a-M0Utz(1;;@w5V_#PUq#yNpY6`K+J|xuP*X*+U7($#A0mu-38~HCaN X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 04 May 2014 18:44:46 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88812 Archived-At: >> I'd still like to hear if file-accessible-directory-p does any better >> than file-executable-p. I got tired of asking, so I simply changed it to use the former anyway, since it can't be any worse than the latter and might be better.