From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26066: 26.0.50; vc-git-status gives wrong result Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 02:36:19 +0300 Message-ID: <7ba3bbb3-389a-ccf0-a9d1-baf25489c8af@yandex.ru> References: <9bf82bf1-fefa-ab84-bac1-cf748ae5ccfb@gmail.com> <87efxy59wx.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <0d87686b-c7d2-deab-ebe4-ab1c8aa4faca@yandex.ru> <29d4a5ae-0ca0-3a86-6b9a-ab616803f39e@gmail.com> <4741bddf-9765-0d94-d0cd-b94e3e4914e1@yandex.ru> <8530cd03-0158-f198-9b14-ade983e1c7f4@gmail.com> <022c0e0a-e039-24ef-66ff-82bcedbacd93@yandex.ru> <505388da-e642-8c98-35c0-261d09ff13e1@yandex.ru> <1a23269d-1ead-1771-1afd-e2c9c5840cb4@gmail.com> <30d8b181-d869-de24-9c86-cc1dc6ec461b@gmail.com> <6ea0d89d-1a24-30fe-dd9a-26a0157a4eae@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1491953835 21333 195.159.176.226 (11 Apr 2017 23:37:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:37:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 To: Jonathan Ganc , npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 26066@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 01:37:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cy5LP-0005PO-Q9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 01:37:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41551 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cy5LV-0005On-81 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52608) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cy5LO-0005Oh-Sm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cy5LK-0005Py-1l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cy5LJ-0005Pl-Uq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cy5LJ-0000uP-Ja for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26066.14919537893449 (code B ref 26066); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2017 23:36:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43448 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cy5Kn-0000tZ-Ju for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:36:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:36738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cy5Kl-0000tK-Mt for 26066@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:36:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id o81so74892978wmb.1 for <26066@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:36:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j9+wvAbJzW1ZRaK3YcDL9XA8pl+mxCYCMfd7JTF8Df8=; b=QjCuEYsgeqJFSQfOJdq2F8FyzcxdYm6GB0qjGycATIqqKgv62mAE/qIllHZBZa7dko lwY6PFQlNSSmwVm/KTXZ/mTtk8f3jPzW0uw1LTuIf/qQHZ4yMN3+r/0HkCUjklJRXZN2 red+fnMTsnLt57WGso7TiPfMKxhLKLMcieYl9VTkolAthFREn9PBL3q1sSyDRDiBmtKO GeJHlpQ9TeHU5JJ8ZTjjIPCbvEUt4Tb4T68eQU9/Y6I7gQmPix3o+Q3tSgzpHQv+ZWy8 miSRMM7G+QM/Js4czU+A8qmvXNoQBoAWbuYwi5euTpRm3DIMSIcXcP+ttfupZzJqdZQ3 GzRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:from:to:references:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j9+wvAbJzW1ZRaK3YcDL9XA8pl+mxCYCMfd7JTF8Df8=; b=MyUslLmA6sDtumvAsx6TKft1vaR2rmKD1BbFqNxszIYOA0Eak0+WoJolA8DTby4eT6 6OIekh8RaIyjOnaqi018T51V2HUHedp9k+4LAYZqger1bRDxahrKQn0kTXfpJiybqjeP u/jOECkUazEWliXgg2IJLnerR8KJ16julh5ubXRsgOqNwsKNw9G91kfaPf+ug751bzt4 w8GZFCax9Al4xc+gTugaUC1w13I2fUjv4fENTBfBVcj7rvepjeQh6kF7wKWDqLfqYK5h ZV8Tfo0U3Vb17TLacSQIFI3tIapAn3fggfJvsOuCjxLRlRIbegcfc2W2G845Wks6ao7r WYyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7Ho0yibQFINaivKs+3TyaICVeHqhZHrt6Gs1m6zeWrOAyKe3iJw8atI4kAm7uNYw== X-Received: by 10.28.184.73 with SMTP id i70mr139218wmf.104.1491953782092; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.173.156]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 92sm23451631wrh.8.2017.04.11.16.36.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:36:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6ea0d89d-1a24-30fe-dd9a-26a0157a4eae@yandex.ru> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131488 Archived-At: On 12.04.2017 02:27, Dmitry Gutov wrote: >> (which, surprisingly, is >>> slighly faster than (file-name-directory (concat default-directory >>> file)) ). > > That probably depends on the file. The first option was faster in the > example I've tried. I meant the second one, sorry.