From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:20:31 +0300 Message-ID: <7b50959d-c315-2c3d-24d6-de5b0575a857@yandex.ru> References: <2056a194.3971.16f8d4dd4c5.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <437eae9b-ccc1-3875-86b7-1af0e61b6e15@gmx.at> <710da57c-28dc-fab7-81af-0318a9389d6a@yandex.ru> <0e41cd9e-8be3-f67a-6958-7bad38ee1266@gmx.at> <6c86c25b-22df-2b69-34fe-539605f624ba@yandex.ru> <7dd69fe5-4ef4-782c-2fba-031d475f6406@yandex.ru> <32fb4915-be55-f753-5f6c-423a09030fd6@gmx.at> <8b252ea4-5902-d21e-a0d7-cdb3ddbb4e08@yandex.ru> <39d47d8c.4bad.16fcd672191.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <729d39eb-d0b4-2cc5-cac3-e129a3effa87@yandex.ru> <06c6b6fb-ce6f-456b-6a22-c5a26a0ab297@gmx.at> <50912835-37d2-f15b-8fd1-b6619893d1ce@yandex.ru> <4a424bf3-ee08-b114-73ef-287bde14003b@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="69128"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: martin rudalics , tumashu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 28 00:21:19 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iwDh0-000HxJ-Gt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:21:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52130 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwDgz-0003mZ-MG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwDgJ-0003BZ-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:20:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwDgI-0003ce-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:20:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::135]:40899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwDgI-0003c2-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:20:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id c23so7623985lfi.7 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:20:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+B20TBnUpjEbLFrAQ5kNDC5VT+Y+f5s5B74UJr9V4+E=; b=W5fDOzuStdWp5euDkmk90PWiF4i8aUWYs5gVSDsygSe7PXrLZZr8HrlnJ4ZSasx331 OWNUwZEpNo+iXx2/BkkZODh7ceBrStwWPm7AFwuKay38rm5islL1rn2QGf8omtbM25QA ZV88K4Gyv/5O8/8u/Xt1CZHRj0gBwrFSLtrytQelEDvv1k5/kCh3xPhv6RT/SNDzwr2S /Aoie+Zs57W+3hiLhWLfPLYHcAXVtzJgsqRwdRdlPRxJu/CUX1dRGvUkTAIWmn/cvRf9 zKmOuukh+dqLLE2UIBrTMzNwXzpqJHDGXHcvdGNcvKSI4RKZz0hOd0zlY8EXiRJc7d9n n0WA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+B20TBnUpjEbLFrAQ5kNDC5VT+Y+f5s5B74UJr9V4+E=; b=PM+xnu7iUVPYySwz2/M96vkSWndkmFv5ueQ9kFI9MsHrlpQA7GaII4l4HtF9lO73Su erYljyin9qEVXTViWaI7GU60ytK//wGmTa2HpF5PaOtzLkcHHrWneUYEgDNFwm/bJ/Pk btceFY7pNu4D38LSbZjxDeIlYDkU2yTpDBXJ25RkdL3qaS3v9cvKEoih/0HIaYD02yNX w41twhIOeXdmHNwW1n+ilKNYhV2esOFKNyhynxZZwrPIqRu/M7VX3k7GKXL8duxEiVPv g47qtYNd2/4oTY/1nyeMeJfGZQDsKOya+lufBDoTloHv+yM3yRA5P+icyw7Yj57UtttP zlHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW0ENZPlKKD2Txsq6W7CYZzkmts/pXPYwIBT4OCr3aHScaOoUMD gVz2XgWzQAVgLXMK1lbLfFa4bCiCFcnHsQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySvAV63OKPLQ12m0Xik4/GZniX2J1yRdrMRQw/5gn5R4Uwp7ZncCQqZyp/mzJD4M38iZGiXg== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5478:: with SMTP id e24mr601572lfn.58.1580167232759; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:20:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.142] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y8sm8780407lji.56.2020.01.27.15.20.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:20:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::135 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244682 Archived-At: On 26.01.2020 20:38, martin rudalics wrote: > Don't you have some old laptop somwehere where you could try the > experiments without scaling (I'd never believe that changing scaling > on-the-fly works always in a reproducible fashion). So, I tried this stuff on an old laptop. Ubuntu 16.04, with whatever version of Unity was there, as well as with GNOME Shell 3.18 (and the same version of GTK3 in both cases). No scaling. Unity: Child frame resizes fine, just like in all other DEs aside from Mutter, apparently. GNOME: Child frame does not resize, even using these rather old GNOME Mutter and GTK. Dragging a normal un-decorated Lucid frame is smooth-ish (with pauses). Although I hadn't tried the more involved experiment involving a child frame. In both: Normal un-decorated frames have exactly the same drag-resizing behavior problem that I described before, so it's definitely not HiDPI-related.