From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Deniz Dogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:37:35 +0100 Message-ID: <7b501d5c1003271637r6039f73brd27d0d7144fc6994@mail.gmail.com> References: <87sk7pzqsp.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87mxxw6c7b.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <20100326092833.19294vuz9efv5qg4@webmail.mnet-online.de> <33DBCF2DFF71401DB0861E66EC29ED2B@us.oracle.com> <5F1D87251C98412EADC1187ABFCC3E8D@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269733094 3773 80.91.229.12 (27 Mar 2010 23:38:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dak@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, mathias@mnet-mail.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, drew.adams@oracle.com To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 28 00:38:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvfZv-00008R-1O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:38:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44562 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvfZu-0007l2-HW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvfZp-0007kx-T6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56458 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvfZm-0007ko-TC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvfZl-0005Oq-Ia for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:54162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvfZl-0005Oe-Do; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:37:57 -0400 Original-Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so1270976wwb.0 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:37:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pe8JEPuEo7vYzWu/knLTW2uRg4LGAXhqgUia6c/RA9A=; b=WY5205F1SKH9Rqz93P3m3mkGK4ws+g735eraCLDYnHAbhDgQzZo8cdVLHdGcPT5iPk Tb5Qo5bm7AtoCY6RfbMKNlQzmn3q4usM0E4iaGh1sz0mkdSqyTS+21w1Mv3LkGd8FRBE vQJCNsXOYQQW9mWfLARmjm5JlB48fk/1/WWxI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IzgnTWsMajrj/GFHJ2gOwT3KZKI99ssIy41GNXpI7sPKD6y9TIweD/+bkfC9+xhl3R xHGdzfNPSVhVkKmrwgs+GL485/AROUu20ZSUSFjC7FQBcnMY0l0aCk7DdRSd4ppKKSSH D6vE5vX6QcVSUgkECdysM567nhUPmaphZ39w8= Original-Received: by 10.216.163.141 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:37:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Original-Received: by 10.216.90.196 with SMTP id e46mr1777716wef.138.1269733075372; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:37:55 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122776 Archived-At: 2010/3/28 Lennart Borgman : > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: >> =A0 =A0> And C-z is currently `suspend-frame' in Emacs. >> >> On a terminal, C-z suspends Emacs and is an important command,. > > Thanks, I forgot. But is there any good reason to use C-z also on > window systems? Why not let it be undo there since that is the most > common use (as far as I know)? > > > Emacs users on Windows systems may like the fact that the bindings are consistent, so that they can use the same .emacs independent of the operating system. --=20 Deniz Dogan