From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Yet another bootstrap failure: Required feature `esh-groups' was not provided Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:49:48 -0400 Message-ID: <7ay75hhvoj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <20080606155915.GA3953@muc.de> <20080606203541.GA1741@muc.de> <7ghcc6q7kf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20080607090749.GB1812@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212868321 13140 80.91.229.12 (7 Jun 2008 19:52:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 19:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 07 21:52:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K54Sx-0003pt-6l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:52:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46289 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K54SA-0006H2-As for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:51:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K54S4-0006EI-7d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:51:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K54S3-0006Dr-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47876 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K54S3-0006Di-IF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:38276) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K54S3-0001of-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1K54Q8-0002Jt-Ss; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:49:48 -0400 X-Spook: bomb morse Croatian Fortezza Bletchley Park Qaddafi CDC X-Ran: -_#mn]2Vx|<43,"N.]5eeNze (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sat, 7 Jun 2008 09:07:49 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98611 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Assuming you mean that you regularly test the build process somehow, > what happens when the build fails? I fix it, if I can. Otherwise wait a bit before reporting, because 56 other people are probably composing "My Emacs does not work!11!!!" emails at the same time. But I'm only testing a clean build, so people not starting from a clean slate may see other problems. It's not reasonable to expect every possible starting point to work flawlessly.