From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Multi-OS Emacs buildbot? Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:01:36 +0200 Message-ID: <7a48604b-99ad-26b8-c993-892a98c2980a@yandex.ru> References: <871rfliy8h.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0tdr60h.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <871rflhbsq.fsf@gnus.org> <87czz5r56v.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <87tushfwkv.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn35fwhv.fsf@gnus.org> <875z4xr4j2.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <87h7ohfvtx.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfdscr4y.fsf@gnus.org> <4d1a67da-d46f-93c5-0ce2-a61cd96c0d0f@yandex.ru> <87y2hsgxk5.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn329wzg.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18729"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 22 13:02:44 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1krgNI-0004ga-2V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:02:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krgNH-00057w-4x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:02:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krgMK-0004g5-HI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:01:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::633]:44293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krgMH-0008WR-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:01:44 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id w1so17883828ejf.11 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 04:01:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CEcMXXwu2nDo1vMX/7vhLyaH0wOi00kdpgEbTqYBr7A=; b=GZlkmrGgtfvU7vHGVwICmLaZ+L/hijQaNubLVaVDzbvnzvhw0L0Vd6Y4tXGLs/H33/ FJEf2BoYzrxMAxGO+DYcYUwY5+sqrad+flCVq6oNGAOR0b0p+LKJnYAvhPN44KtX535Y BbTEAE81fzoDopSvqnPKY7XsipNbLeq0NTHseAs39elazOvud4E8F89vHC/Km/mgHd0/ HPbnl5d1ERGLCO++dGKXIpyVHMw7THFjrKU3hJl4sMnMblDP9KXKw6nbcQA5ly5ZjiKP KO6VIN5yLafDBWh4TnWbwtGQkEY7+RDSoLlH9POg5xKNt040NdquWVwF7Pfl1elZabKB Er/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CEcMXXwu2nDo1vMX/7vhLyaH0wOi00kdpgEbTqYBr7A=; b=sOe9vRltVRjNMPSjnLEty/y1fHUlQbzW3Haa1crWruaXZmXKZRNIA8PiVjBWTwZbRa PQBKRrE4D4bpD9rgwNeA/tw2aU9HYlAdklfSUv5/dZ8MYm//q5KYOz5t/pqU82yvpGKq mh1qYP5u76+Bsn9gUFXJD+TsGti5P3WhYWnqVUpGt3L7q51tRjKntyFAPHIPUD2e04+P XbV4sObYu8N7ax54IbBC94huRTi48kNf0mZ0XQe0kQ/CplpFb7W3ztpz4w4ASirw1wYc hswJZVtUcQji9RjGtOy9XWt/M8uaP7PV4uR/ku6q3OvhlsWT9sf7+Crj5/ZkMLfKyChu vWcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533e2es8I3sfvyZ/SNd+AGq8yoDFAhZ8mmqk+QVpRH4UCCUcFz+C AFseR8/GZy9zoE6T1O7kYGWp4Xi3r5oViA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznTYGaXfRZkhMq9Ntg0VnhPXrmQQbmNpeP51tSEFvoe74XoPszciDhfOVt7MFhtOScVkGxcg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:52c1:: with SMTP id w1mr6543118ejn.214.1608638499127; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 04:01:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm23315620edv.93.2020.12.22.04.01.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 04:01:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87pn329wzg.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::633; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x633.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -39 X-Spam_score: -4.0 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.521, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261478 Archived-At: On 22.12.2020 08:27, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> On pushes. It might be not apparent from the web interface, but the >> Gitlab CI skips intermediate commits for, say, efficiency reasons. >> >> It's common practice, IME. > Right. But when there's a failure, I thought they bisected back to the > first failing commit in that batch? I don't remember any of them doing that.