From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "modern" colors Re: Changes for emacs 28 Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 03:51:08 +0300 Message-ID: <7a0ad8f3-8871-b653-d9f1-1cee105ff1ed@yandex.ru> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37872"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: "casouri@gmail.com" , Ergus , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" , "Alfred M. Szmidt" , "monnier@iro.umontreal.ca" , "ghe@sdf.org" , "tecosaur@gmail.com" To: arthur miller , Ricardo Wurmus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 13 02:52:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHGFN-0009il-Bm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 02:52:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47392 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHGFM-0005YP-E4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:52:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHGEh-00057q-48 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::230]:32983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHGEf-0001Ob-K2; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:51:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id k25so15588965ljk.0; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:51:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xGeiY3Uryp5TMCnmHSNRnPCPHGNxw4tVXiA0G3iLuxU=; b=FBM62UbYK3/Oxi+868zVg4rUKKJ02tBF85G9XBuxbp0+rzXSWQu8z9v7UlyvGOVdvH PQ5Bq/mCA73q/saNfZ88Ip6M9i57AibWj8dK4mEtf/FfKI6/xNpdaxVXvBfDkeFkVEx4 ctNcfJENqdgugVGj34jO5fJiatEBfXP4zfCcSm5gyGTvD6jDxg7B7iW/DD98jr8rMPF0 LXv090JvhYVmgYwa9hGQ0HOZOpz/eD3y5xZduRHHp74vb05rV9TztQdaEWe/yVQ9N+fH TFq1/0HtSS5TH6mUBx6y6kkXhsTiZ1NUaCR/pUG1+in3PfIEmFvl6gKUADES2o+Sf8uO NZJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xGeiY3Uryp5TMCnmHSNRnPCPHGNxw4tVXiA0G3iLuxU=; b=d7xOVWEa8y+HvwJyS32po5jpIOuOsLMqaWyCbXBXgcVCOMLJ49YuYD2srDP+C0HxBz +uDJwbQTdZ6sJzLJmvfC0ySilvvBtiEDMY92t+tzy9USKp3mqPiDoGuoIFImsOVMwF8A /ad5lWf9a/92QgDK4NmCWCBgBSfJ6OcE3x2bSU8aZvntqwAAhORJ0ZLwSyos003yWfxR lcHDwS17pN+24ro6cIEyAB6hsVJ8ateYe/syHql3hRTdUN9xpyJzIVsFZc20I0cv+tN3 WictHA4WlwsVbtFiZBl+Yd8pA+2kjCou42X/ZOtxeD3LkeRWpxbYFlDsiXPU5ecqoV7V Z5/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FcAGCuChvIs5lhzkUZDd41dUrZbfRrjxR9h7q0Uym4OnxvNac 1eGhYWS8bave6HMYVcrYLqs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnphrmihcNmq/DybWw04YWf/a1M88Ey2lSHb93UG3WBX8OeE4LlovC6WGQJXVhPa8Ye8VS0g== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5d2:: with SMTP id 201mr2851936ljf.73.1599958275219; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.104] ([94.229.108.16]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u26sm2128472ljd.47.2020.09.12.17.51.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:51:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::230; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x230.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.543, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255420 Archived-At: On 13.09.2020 03:36, arthur miller wrote: > But to the topic, I indeed suggested to include Solarized in Emacs, but > I also suggested to turn Batsov's implementation of Solarized into more > general framework for defining color schemes in Emacs so that people can > use it to easily create  and I stall whichever color scheme they like. > Thus it does not need to be limited to low contrast at all. Yes, it's an interesting idea. I don't have the time to explore it, but others are very welcome to. > It would make Emacs look more aesthetically pleasing if packages output > data in more color consistent and coherent  way instead of everyone > sprinkling hardcoded RGB values for their outputs. Yup. It sounds like a big change, though.