From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=90=B4=E9=94=90=E6=89=AC?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32438: 26.1; Long command in shell-mode results in ^G being displayed Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 12:44:08 -0700 Message-ID: <7D293136-0F2A-44B8-9386-428F11708536@gmail.com> References: <1534264792.1726113.1473947424.493E07CA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83tuqpo6rp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26189"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 32438@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 06 20:45:38 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TWU-0006ij-BW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 20:45:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38454 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TWS-0004Bs-Sm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:45:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TVv-0004BW-Hv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TVu-0002Go-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TVu-0005h8-7h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=90=B4=E9=94=90=E6=89=AC?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 19:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32438 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 32438-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32438.161264065921826 (code B ref 32438); Sat, 06 Feb 2021 19:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32438) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2021 19:44:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TVD-0005fy-9m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:44:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:35449) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TVB-0005fm-Vx for 32438@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:44:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id g3so5307453plp.2 for <32438@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:44:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=TyvZbd5rsOKWfvBOgLGxad3YGwII2g5TxI9YaSrHDec=; b=V6a3KzO7mqe0ZWfxDAmYN8snfoKVHOdJMZYF/o7UbSKSM0eUZEyT9rU1ySBFff7Td2 q9t+0nXu2Pi2FDFzRpDwy3/6cWWrSvVQtoH0x6u706z6jz7gM3xOumpMpKdVqp1h5X6j FKtOmt/ZH8C0ofCYhexqmhkbSsaZSbcBi/dH7bIHE6PFZvjeH5f8JpoCCY6oJJ1rfger CIJiZ5sQptaGTzuG0Kr429cdQ221m+wq6yjbu0/4kGLvEyhn5+9UfYs9RWt/Kixy5eBm 01NNLlmvZwbnEdvRN5x9PE7z7aPiRN0Ver1IQyPnGpevDElrICR2Kw86XPhr3mT5kNFR LuPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=TyvZbd5rsOKWfvBOgLGxad3YGwII2g5TxI9YaSrHDec=; b=UVYHX7Qt+B4h87R5zvf5mARLWNLSTwjsSOiKw64MTikg7o6+lCT3Iu8FnvWgySOwgB dYDXwMtLs7QDIo5eXh/lBsKoeUA0iVnLDGrCOlRHQDnKf1Un/B1IYAoMdmVz8UCrAyyN hg9z04At/TBL6Pd3hI3iFthelmnDxKro7ZpkMsXP3R5VoTq+4/lCPXidKGWUQFKv6Yz8 XJfoYwXNAUWMbti+7UVmwqiL/QHTnHY1zUsDdW4sllueljfomLCTD6sEbzxTO9H9dhZQ HHDFwzYhFVuI6NeovJkxDGY5IrLPczM+GALricJAiVMaa/abS3AwdrPkrO7fcU0MN7Bs ZGzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Qi+0ItXnOF4e/h3CBKvBGmRsfCN8UfbbAUpWVT9yYT0jWILx7 4Kq0FMloWix9U6Qp1KARB0E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwClWWS+yeuYAPn5OhCXX8ONmMFy/P9hyN8DTyDwGlMAovYqzCFGFN2pnz8D/lpkEKbNWuWmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c9d2:b029:e2:ad28:65e8 with SMTP id q18-20020a170902c9d2b02900e2ad2865e8mr9485069pld.85.1612640651849; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:44:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8800:7c85:2000:496b:f9fd:8af8:b940? ([2600:8800:7c85:2000:496b:f9fd:8af8:b940]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y73sm8349935pfb.17.2021.02.06.11.44.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:44:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83tuqpo6rp.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199455 Archived-At: Oh I thought that was not conclusive, as the bug is not labeled as = =E2=80=9Cconfirmed=E2=80=9D in the bug tracker. But anyways, I just = wanted to add some extra info, useful or not, especially the testing on = the m1 chip Mac. Thanks. Ruiyang > On Feb 6, 2021, at 3:00 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 >> From: =E5=90=B4=E9=94=90=E6=89=AC >> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 22:20:56 -0700 >>=20 >> I just want to follow up on this bug since it has been around for a = while. Although I cannot reproduce this bug with the steps described in = the original bug report, it definitely exists and can be reproduced in a = clearer way: = https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/40603/process-input-seems-buggy-= in-emacs-on-os-x >> I personally encountered this in ESS inferior R buffer: = https://github.com/emacs-ess/ESS/issues/1093 >>=20 >> I have tested this under macOS Catalina and Big Sur with master = branch Emacs and Yamamoto=E2=80=99s Emacs Mac Port. This bug can always = be reproduced. I also tried on an m1 arm MacBook, and it is still there = so it has nothing to do with architecture. >>=20 >> Hopefully this can help you identify the issue. >=20 > Didn't Andreas already identify it in >=20 > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D32438#13 >=20 > ?