From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20871: 25.0.50; fill-single-char-nobreak-p does not recognize a single-letter word when it is preceded by an open paren Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 09:42:28 -0800 (GMT-08:00) Message-ID: <7985af2e-fb1d-40ad-bb37-bca783e58044@default> References: <87y4jchwog.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpywhwa8.fsf@mbork.pl> <87shyku4jt.fsf@mbork.pl> <8337qkb7v7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2jwtfkj.fsf@mbork.pl> <83r3e49o4g.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb33h6ux.fsf@mbork.pl> <83a8kfzff7.fsf@gnu.org> <87shy4vc9x.fsf@mbork.pl> <838tzvpcjb.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb2zth8r.fsf@mbork.pl> <837fffp8zt.fsf@gnu.org> <877fff3v7n.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462038233 4670 80.91.229.3 (30 Apr 2016 17:43:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20871@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 30 19:43:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1awYvb-0000DP-CZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:43:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59132 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYvX-0004iX-9c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:43:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYvO-0004Uz-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:43:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYv3-0006Sr-Jy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:43:20 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYv3-0006R3-Fy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awYv0-0005T0-1E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20871 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20871-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20871.146203815820983 (code B ref 20871); Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2016 17:42:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58253 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awYuc-0005SN-Cl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:45672) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awYub-0005SA-9F for 20871@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u3UHgU1A013939 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:42:31 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u3UHgUI7010028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:42:30 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0019.oracle.com (abhmp0019.oracle.com [141.146.116.25]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3UHgTI8014352; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:42:29 GMT In-Reply-To: <877fff3v7n.fsf@mbork.pl> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6744.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117401 Archived-At: > I think that my confusion is a sufficient proof that more precise > documentation is needed. +1. Maybe not "more precise" (I cannot judge whether what is there is precise), but more user-friendly. It is fine (great) to use the precise Unicode terminology and to point to the Unicode standard for more information. But it also helpful to provide a little coaching in the Emacs doc, for us users who are not Unicode pros. It probably would not take much additional explanation. > > If we want to enhance those doc strings, each one of them should state > > what Unicode blocks are covered. (It would be okay to say something > > like "all Latin blocks", instead of enumerating them all, and > > similarly for the other categories.) >=20 > A user might not know what exactly a "Unicode block" is. (I don't.) > I think a pointer to some sources or a few words of explanation are > really needed. (I won't make a patch, though, since I clearly know too > little about it to do it correctly.) +1 This kind of user feedback is helpful. It should not be ignored, IMO, especially if the reason for ignoring is just that the doc is accurate and precise. It's also about being amenable (dare I say even "inviting") to an average Emacs user.