From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62537: Error compiling emacs master with native compilation activated Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 12:42:18 +0200 Message-ID: <775940BE-8158-4AFE-8AA1-5FBA4D7C2C95@acm.org> References: <664DC8F8-EEEC-4A90-A4F5-86C11378486C@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26269"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 62537@debbugs.gnu.org, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 06 12:43:33 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pkN5Z-0006fG-Bc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 12:43:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pkN57-0004fZ-0k; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 06:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pkN55-0004ev-9R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 06:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pkN54-0006D3-UK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 06:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pkN54-0000L0-Hq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 06:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 10:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62537 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62537-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62537.16807777461246 (code B ref 62537); Thu, 06 Apr 2023 10:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62537) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2023 10:42:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pkN4T-0000K1-NN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 06:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail236c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.246]:57126 helo=mail56c50.megamailservers.eu) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pkN4R-0000Jp-ED for 62537@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 06:42:24 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1680777741; bh=4jUn0tbAh8uLNQ+Sef1g6nvZ0/B1LrHk0liRmV1a1pI=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=jSddae2a4PTEeUxBkgiTzOFo3wqyeEQLqmFoKyd5vyIPGhFbDKARFu3KM9FVq4Gag bczkApMWtcOY5i+PZ6lODnvXr7Rqpg32euNlAGTQaqdzrsJTqW3RewJ4ueqgQdcpIY q9ZtcRPE1qTKvNG10aEBGkcnOCWw94NwdijyhycA= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (c188-150-165-235.bredband.tele2.se [188.150.165.235]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail56c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 336AgILh048416; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:42:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15) X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdejfedgvdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecujffquffvqffrkfetpdfqfgfvpdfgpfggqdevhedtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjffevgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrthhtihgrshcugfhnghguvghgnohrugcuoehmrghtthhirghsvgesrggtmhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveekffdujefhkeehvdfgffeikefghfefvdekueffleegfeekueelhfejieefkefgnecukfhppedukeekrdduhedtrdduieehrddvfeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepudekkedrudehtddrudeihedrvdefhedphhgvlhhopehsmhhtphgtlhhivghnthdrrghpphhlvgdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmrghtthhirghsvgesrggtmhdrohhrghdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepgedprhgtphhtthhopegrkhhrlhesshgufhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeeivdehfeejseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhgpdhrtghpth htohepphgrrghguhhtihesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegvlhhiiiesghhnuhdrohhrgh X-Origin-Country: SE X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259312 Archived-At: 5 apr. 2023 kl. 19.19 skrev Andrea Corallo : > In 29 the bug never showed up > (probably because the new LAP tweak is not it) so I guess it's better = to > leave the code as it is. Actually I don't think I can prove that the LAP code will never have the = pattern that triggered the bug in Emacs 29; nothing prevents it in = principle from occurring anyway. It doesn't seem safe to keep the buggy limplification in that branch -- = I suggest we remove the switch-eliminating optimisation in comp.el = altogether just in case. What do you think?