From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: eww and bookmarks Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7710412d-f153-4153-8351-da73b1a6f1cf@default> References: <87k1163jz5.fsf@gmail.com> <87zha21i17.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnau45wp.fsf@web.de> <87pnatlo1h.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh9wljig.fsf@web.de> <87k10za187.fsf@web.de> <874krj9bgs.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="39883"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 10 22:07:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jj70G-000AGx-A3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:07:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54324 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj70F-0000BY-4L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:07:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj6yQ-0006Bc-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:05:22 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:43900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj6yN-0000w4-Nc; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:05:20 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05AK2JGS136510; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:05:14 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=cM7JvrnyNU9azh224gGopbVVYIdrpXzhuti8rAsRy3I=; b=F3EsaRzWbj5wx3yAthUaW3C/13sLIv2R9JEe3514Ngb3rPzUzvqZow1K74/afvVTtMVf gN+vNf2gLk/P81QCrEkcSttdqUz5owR3XplZfZcewbnyrj/UFFcfbcDuoT8YmrcDv5ik 8qXbZUxq4EnU5NAXsssz/t/UT5Ff551XSR9Xo/YgTG4yR7xb6LUtqghH9KrvxLvCHIk1 Fp8HM4FCrjRNyue6C+NyBD40Gqj0sQBVMZ8wXQelfbPkVFM+/+MlO2e+6CpLPXL0GF54 LXqPOqqJdv6+6ZwUrDc/OfpkCba9asKCAJUudOqmqM2LsYSvkuaXdO+ZBt/39k+ccnFy Ug== Original-Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 31g2jrccc8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:05:13 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05AK2RkV019223; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:03:13 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 31gn29wwpx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:03:13 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 05AK38kq011808; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:03:11 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5005.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9648 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006100149 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9648 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006100149 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.86; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2130.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/10 16:05:15 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -63 X-Spam_score: -6.4 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252090 Archived-At: Dunno why, but this message of mine seems never to have made it to the mailing list (?). Maybe this time will be luckier. ___ > > > Could you give us some background? Do eww bookmarks offer some featu= re > > > that vanilla bookmarks don't support? Or did you just want to have > > > something separate? > > > > There's two reasons -- I had no idea that bookmark.el existed. Well, > > OK, that's the main reason. > > > > The other is that ever web browser has a bookmark facility, and that's > > not usually mixed in with, well, other stuff. >=20 > [Still dunno why I'm not seeing emacs-devel@gnu.org in the cc list for a = few > posts, and I have to add it manually because Reply All doesn't find it.] >=20 > FYI/FWIW - >=20 > When you use ordinary Emacs bookmarks (e.g. bookmark.el > or Bookmark+), there's no requirement to mix bookmarks > of different types. So EWW bookmarks that are "normal" > (i.e. Emacs bookmarks, not what EWW calls "bookmarks") > need not be "mixed in with, well, other stuff." >=20 > You can organize bookmarks in different ways. One way > is to use different bookmark files - you can have a file > just for your EWW bookmarks, or just EWW bookmarks for > certain purposes. You can have any number of bookmark > files, and it's simple to switch among them. >=20 > If you use Bookmark+, there are several other ways to > organize bookmarks, including: >=20 > * Different bookmark-list displays (which can themselves > be bookmarked, BTW, as can bookmark files). So even if > the current bookmark file has bookmarks of different > kinds you can show and act on different sets of them, > using different listings. [1] [2] [3] >=20 > * You can tag bookmarks, and view/list or act on only > those that have a given tag or set of tags. Tags allow > organizations other than just flat sets or trees. Tags > provide the most flexible way to organize bookmarks. [4] >=20 > * You can sort bookmarks in the bookmark-list display in > various ways, including according to type (e.g. all EWW > bookmarks first). [5] >=20 > * You can filter the bookmark-list display, to show only > bookmarks that satisfy some condition(s) (e.g. being an > EWW bookmark). And you can omit bookmarks from display > that satisfy some conditions (as in Dired file omitting). > [6] [7] > ___ >=20 >=20 > [1]: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BookmarkPlus#BookmarkListDisplay >=20 > [2]: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BookmarkPlus#bookmark-listBookmarks >=20 > [3]: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BookmarkPlus#BookmarkFileBookmarks >=20 > [4]: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BookmarkPlus#BookmarkTags >=20 > [5]: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BookmarkPlus#SortingBookmarks >=20 > [6]: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BookmarkPlus#FilteringBookmarks >=20 > [7]: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BookmarkPlus#OmittingBookmarks