AW: CEDET update

["Berndl, Klaus" <klaus.berndl@capgemini-sdm.com>]

Hi,

i'm the maintainer of ECB and therefore also for tree-buffer.el... as the naming already expresses, tree-buffer.el is independent from ECB (the name doesn' start with ecb-) though it has been developed primarly for ECB - but is contains NO dependency to ECB and AFAIK ;-) and also no advices - it simply is a library which allows displaying arbitrary stuff in a tree-structure... is can display the tree completey in ascii-manner (e.g. [+] for an expand-symbol) but it is much nicer when using images for this...

Well, back to topic: It you like it you can integrate tree-buffer.el into Emacs as stand-alone lib... (when images should be used you can also integrate the images of ECB)...

But, i still have not signed any papers - but if you tell me what i have to do, where i can get them etc.. , then i can do it...

best regards
klaus

________________________________________
Von: emacs-devel-bounces+klaus.berndl=sdm.de@gnu.org [emacs-devel-bounces+klaus.berndl=sdm.de@gnu.org] im Auftrag von Nick Roberts [nickrob@snap.net.nz]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. September 2009 05:13
An: Chong Yidong
Cc: Eric M. Ludlam; emacs-devel@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: CEDET update

 > > Does it include ECB?  I would like to use tree-buffer.el for watch
 > > expressions in the GDB Graphical Interface instead of the speedbar.
 > > If not, does CEDET have something similar?  Otherwise, could we add
 > > that to the trunk too?  ISTR that, at one time, there was talk about
 > > including ECB in Emacs.
 >
 > No, ECB is not included.  My feeling is that including it right now will
 > lead to "indigestion"; CEDET is already a big enough addition.  (Adding
 > ECB would also require us to get the window grouping interface working.)

You've not answered my question: does CEDET have something similar?

 > That reminds me: I haven't replaced "our" Speedbar with CEDET's version.

Which might make it more important for the GDB Graphical Interface not to
use the speedbar.

The file tree-buffer.el is 168k and appears to be self contained. CEDET seems
to be fifty times bigger.  As for causing "indigestion", it brings
Mr. Creosote to mind:

"Just one more wafer-thin mint, sir?"

--
Nick                                           http://users.snap.net.nz/~nickrob