bug#25618: 25.1.91; More precise limit for tagging expensive tests

[Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>]

On 02/10/2017 05:49 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 02:54:03 +0900 (JST)
>> cc: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>, 25618@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>
>>>> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 22:42:44 +0900
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Prefer set a numeric limit of seconds than using the word 'few'.
>>>>
>>>> For instance, in my box the test `cl-seq-test-bug24264' in
>>>> test/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-seq-tests.el
>>>> takes 7 s.
>>>> With an explicit numeric threshold is easier to decide whether this test
>>>> must be tagged as expensive or not.
>>>>
>>>> In following patch i define a few as 2-3 seconds.  Other people might
>>>> prefer 4-5 or even higher.
>>>> Please, suggest a proper value to consider a test as expensive.
>>> I think 2-3 sec is negligible, and 7 sec is not long enough to annoy.
>>> 10 sec or more is beginning to sound like it comes close to "too
>>> long", and 20 sec is definitely too long.
>> Thank you.  Now is clear.
>> Are you OK with keep the sentence as it is now?
>> I mean, keep: 'some few seconds'.
> It's okay to leave it as is.  I also don't object to saying something
> more specific, but 2-3 sec sound just too few to me.
Thanks.  It's not a big thing.  I will leave it as it is.