From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:15:47 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <7494-Sat20Mar2004171547+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <200403201415.i2KEFNq19043@f7.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1079796379 4881 80.91.224.253 (20 Mar 2004 15:26:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 20 16:25:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B4iMG-0005HJ-00 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:25:56 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B4iMG-0003ww-00 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:25:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B4iIo-0001cI-Ps for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B4iHX-0001QS-QU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B4iGz-0001GL-Ox for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B4iGz-0001G0-4Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:20:29 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.144.65]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id BMR12355; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:17:52 +0200 (IST) Original-To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <200403201415.i2KEFNq19043@f7.net> (karl@freefriends.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:20643 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:20643 > Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:15:23 -0500 > From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) > > Doesn't sound a big problem to me: someone who looks for a library > function can manage to remember that they come from libc. > > Not all library functions are in libc. If you refer to additional libraries, I think a programmer has a good knowledge in what library each function lives. After all, it's the same programmer who needs to add a -lFOO switch to the link command line.