From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Chinese characters support Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 06:34:12 +0300 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <7458-Sun11May2003063411+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <84he8292dt.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <20030511.023149.92589622.acmuller@gol.com> <84el36a9ly.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <20030511.111532.71081836.acmuller@gol.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1052624297 11969 80.91.224.249 (11 May 2003 03:38:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 03:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 11 05:38:15 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19EhfC-00036n-00 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:38:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19EhgU-00036m-03 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 May 2003 23:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Ehft-0002sK-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 May 2003 23:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Ehfb-0002aO-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 May 2003 23:38:39 -0400 Original-Received: from balder.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.15]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Eheu-00024q-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 May 2003 23:37:56 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretsky (tony08-234-90.inter.net.il [80.230.234.90] (may be forged)) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id CIB48491; Sun, 11 May 2003 06:37:53 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <20030511.111532.71081836.acmuller@gol.com> (message from Charles Muller on Sun, 11 May 2003 11:15:32 +0900 (JST)) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:9559 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:9559 > Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 11:15:32 +0900 (JST) > From: Charles Muller > > No, it is exactly the opposite. It is common for one to be able to display > the HELLO file without problems, but to still have difficulty displaying CJK > in other encodings, especially UTF-8. So etc/HELLO is not the ultimate solution for testing how well CJK is handled. So what? It certainly helps to test certain aspects of that. And for a file that requires near-zero maintenance, that's a lot.